A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING RACE, CLASS, GENDER, AND SEXUALITY
Article first published online: 28 JUL 2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00139.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Weber, L. (1998), A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING RACE, CLASS, GENDER, AND SEXUALITY. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22: 13–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00139.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 28 JUL 2006
- Article first published online: 28 JUL 2006
- Initial submission: November 4, 1996 Initial acceptance: July 18, 1997 Final acceptance: October 15, 1997
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Since the mid-1980s, scholarship and college courses that address multiple dimensions of inequality under the rubric of race, class, gender, and (recently) sexuality studies have grown rapidly. Most courses now employ a set of readings, many of which are drawn from a growing number of anthologies. A strength of this approach is its presentation of the diversity of human experiences and the multiplicity of critical perspectives. A weakness is its failure to convey the commonalities in race, class, gender, and sexuality analyses of social reality. To aid in teaching and research on race, class, gender, and sexuality, this article presents six common themes that characterize this scholarship. Race, class, gender, and sexuality are historically and globally specific, socially constructed power relations that simultaneously operate at both the macro (societal) and micro (individual) levels of society. Scholarship in this tradition emphasizes the interdependence of knowledge and activism.

1471-6402/asset/PWQU_left.gif?v=1&s=08d2b33b80648d93cc63fecfceed8dedfc202524)
1471-6402/asset/PWQU_right.gif?v=1&s=2d1820ca4aa3cab831ceb905215826d390c32c0b)
1471-6402/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=5b8997f3f56e85254ca0605e8b1a7d72a6ac789f)