SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Alvesson, M., & Billing, Y. D. (1992). Gender and organization: Towards a differentiated understanding. Organization Studies, 13, 73103.
  • Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 261295.
  • Astin, A. W., Oseguera, L., Sax, L. J., & Korn, W. S. (2002). The American freshman: Thirty-five year trends, 1966-2001. Los Angeles : Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
  • Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Ayman, R. (2004). Situational and contingency approaches to leadership. In J.Antonakis, A. T.Cianciolo, & R. J.Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 148170). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Baxter, J., & Wright, E. O. (2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society, 14, 275294.
  • Beatty, S. (2004, September 9). Boss talk: Plotting plaid's future: Burberry's Rose Marie Bravo designs ways to keep brand growing and still exclusive. Wall Street Journal, p. B1, 8.
  • Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544557.
  • Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2000). Gender differences in pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 7599.
  • Borman, W. C. (2004). The concept of organizational citizenship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 238241.
    Direct Link:
  • Bowen, C., Swim, J. K., & Jacobs, R. R. (2000). Evaluating gender biases on actual job performance of real people: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 21942215.
  • Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of U.S. gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106133.
  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York : Harper & Row.
  • Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 8199.
  • Carroll, J. (2006, September 1). Americans prefer male boss to a female boss. Retrieved September 10, 2006 from Gallup Brain Web site: http://brain.gallup.com
  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 3353.
  • Catalyst. (2001). Women in corporate leadership: Comparisons among the US, the UK, and Canada. Retrieved September 27, 2006 from http://www.catalyst.org/files/fact/US,%20UK,%20Canada%20WICL%20Comparisons.pdf
  • Catalyst. (2004). The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. Retrieved September 27, 2006 from https://www.catalyst.org/files/full/financialperformancereport.pdf
  • CBS News/New York Times. (2006, February 5). A woman for president. Retrieved September 10, 2006 from http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/020306woman.pdf#search=%22a%20woman%20for%20president%20CBS%20News%2FNew%20York%20Times%20Poll%22
  • Chin, J. L. (2004). Feminist leadership: Feminist visions and diverse voices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 18.
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Conlin, M. (2003, May 26). The new gender gap: From kindergarten to grad school, boys are becoming the second sex. Business Week. Retrieved September 18, 2006 from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_21/_b3834001mz001.htm?chan=search
  • Cranfield University School of Management. (2005). The female FTSE report: 2005. Cranfield , Bedford , UK : Author. Retrieved December 18, 2006 from http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/research/centres/cdwbl/downloads/FTSE2005full.pdf
  • Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225248.
  • Dobryznyski, J. H. (2006, August 4). Cherchez la femme. Wall Street Journal, p. A16.
  • Dowd, M. (2006, September 6). New themes for the same old songs. New York Times, p. A21.
  • Duehr, E. E., & Bono, J. E. (2006). Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing? Personnel Psychology.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807834.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2004). Women and men as leaders. In J.Antonakis, A. T.Cianciolo, & R. J.Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 279301). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (in press). Through the labrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. F.Dovidio, P.Glick, & L.Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 1935). Malden , MA : Blackwell.
  • Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569591.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573598.
  • Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125145.
  • Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 322.
  • Elliott, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (2004). Race, gender, and workplace power. American Sociological Review, 69, 365386.
  • Erhardt, M. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11, 102111.
  • Ferdman, B. M. (1999). The color and culture of gender in organizations: Attending to race and ethnicity. In G.Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender & work (pp. 1734). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Fiorina, C. (2006). Tough choices: A memoir. New York : Penguin.
  • Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 2142.
  • Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 264280.
  • Hackman, M. Z., Furniss, A. H., Hills, M. J., & Patterson, T. J. (1992). Perceptions of gender-role characteristics and transformational and transactional leadership behaviours. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 311319.
  • Heffernan, M. (2002, August). The female CEO ca. 2002. Fast Company, 61, 9, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66.
  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657674.
  • Herbert, B. (2006, May 19). Hillary can run, but can she win? New York Times, p. A29.
  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581592.
  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York : Cambridge University Press.
  • Jackson, R. M. (1998). Destined for equality: The inevitable rise of women's status. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901910.
  • Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589617.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York : Basic Books.
  • Krishnan, H. A., & Park, D. (2005). A few good women—on top management teams. Journal of Business Research, 58, 17121720.
  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385425.
  • Lyness, K. S., & Thompson, D. E. (2000). Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 86101.
  • Maume, D. J., Jr. (2004). Is the glass ceiling a unique form of inequality? Evidence from a random-effects model of managerial attainment. Work and Occupations, 31, 250274.
  • Miner, J. B. (1993). Role motivation theories. New York : Routledge.
  • Moore, D. W. (2003, June 10). Little prejudice against a woman, Jewish, Black, or Catholic presidential candidate. Retrieved September 10, 2006 from Gallup Brain Web site: http://brain.gallup.com
  • Newport, F. (2001, February 21). Americans see women as emotional and affectionate, men as more aggressive: Gender specific stereotypes persist in recent Gallup poll. Retrieved September 10, 2006 from Gallup Brain Web site: http://brain.gallup.com
  • Nieva, V. G., & Gutek, B. A. (1981). Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York : Praeger.
  • Paolillo, J. G. P. (1981). Manager's self assessments of managerial roles: The influence of hierarchical level. Journal of Management, 7, 4352.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513563.
  • Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A., & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management, 28, 177193.
  • Ragins, B. R., Cornwell, J. M., & Miller, J. S. (2003). Heterosexism in the workplace: Do race and gender matter? Group & Organization Management, 28, 4574.
  • Rapoport, R., Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J. K., & Pruitt, B. H. (2002). Beyond work-family balance: Advancing gender equity and workplace performance. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
  • Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675688.
  • Sczesny, S., Bosak, J., Neff, D., & Schyns, B. (2004). Gender stereotypes and the attribution of leadership traits: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 51, 631645.
  • Seltzer, R. A., Newman, J., & Leighton, M. V. (1997). Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in U.S. elections. Boulder , CO : Lynne Reinner.
  • Sharpe, R. (2000, November 20). As leaders, women rule: New studies find that female managers outshine their male counterparts in almost every measure. Business Week, p. 74. Retrieved December 15, 2000, from Business Week Online, http://www.businessweek.com/common_frames/ca.htm?/2000/00_47/b3708145.htm
  • Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Issues, 9, 355372.
  • Silvestri, M. (2003). Women in charge: Policing, gender and leadership. Portland , OR : Willan Publishing.
  • Smith, E. R. A. N., & Fox, R. L., (2001). The electoral fortunes of women candidates for Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 205221.
  • Sokolove, M. (2006, February). Follow me. New York Times Sports Magazine, pp. 96101, 116–117.
  • Timberlake, S. (2005). Social capital and gender in the workplace. Journal of Management Development, 24, 3444.
  • Tischler, L. (2005, September). The CEO's new clothes. Fast Company, pp. 2728.
  • Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305325.
  • Twenge, J. M. (2001). Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133145.
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005, September). News: American time-use survey—2004 results announced by BLS. Retrieved June 10, 2006 from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus.pdf
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Women in the labor force: A databook. Report 996. Retrieved December 18, 2006 from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook2006.htm
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2007. Washington , DC : U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved December 18, 2006 from http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract.html
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (2003). Women's earnings: Work patterns partially explain difference between men's and women's earnings (GAO-04-35). Washington , DC : Author. Retrieved July 30, 2004 from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0435.pdf
  • U.S. National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Digest of education statistics, 2005. Washington , DC : Author. Retrieved June 3, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d05_tf.asp
  • Van Engen, M. L., Van Der Leeden, R., & Willemsen, T. M. (2001). Gender, context and leadership styles: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 581598.
  • Wajcman, J. (1998). Managing like a man: Women and men in corporate management. University Park , PA : Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park , CA : Sage.
  • Yoder, J. D. (2001). Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 815828.
  • Yoder, J. D., Schleicher, T. L., & McDonald, T. W. (1998). Empowering token women leaders: The importance of organizationally legitimated credibility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 209222.