SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Ashby, J., Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). Legal work and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to lead problematic cases. William and Mary Law Journal, 13, 775793.
  • Bruckmüller, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (in press). The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leader in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology.
  • Burrell, B. (1993). John Bailey's legacy: Political parties and women candidacies for public office. In L.Duke (Ed.), Women in politics: Have the outsiders become insiders? (pp. 123134). Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice-Hall.
  • Catalyst. (2009). 2008 Catalyst census of women in Fortune 500 corporate officer and board positions. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/132/us-women-in-business
  • Center for American Women and Politics. (2009). Women in elective office. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective.pdf
  • Centre for Advancement of Women in Politics. (2008). Women members of the House of Lords. Retrieved from http://www.qub.ac.uk/cawp/UKhtmls/lordsnew.htm
  • Childs, S. (2004). A feminised style of politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 6, 319.
  • Davies, M. (2002, March 22). Thatcher's famous speeches. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1888158.stm
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573598.
  • Electoral Commission. (2006). Election results. Retrieved from http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/election-data/
  • Equal Opportunities Commission. (2002). Women and men in Britain: Management. Manchester , UK : Author.
  • Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2008). Sex and power 2008. Retrieved from http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/Documents/EHRC/SexandPower/Sex_and_Power_2008.pdf
  • European Commission. (2005). Social values, science and technology. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf
  • Falk, E., & Kenski, K. (2006). Issue saliency and gender stereotypes: Support for women as presidents in times of war and terrorism. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 118.
  • Fawcett Society. (2005). Nearly half voters denied choice of voting for a women. Retrieved from http://www.fawcett.wholething.co.uk/documents/Women_candidates_May05.doc
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878902.
  • Fox, R. L., & Smith, E. R. A. N. (1998). The role of candidate sex in voter decision-making. Political Psychology, 19, 405414.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1998). Women and the evolution of world politics. Foreign Affairs, 77, 2440.
  • Gertzog, I. N., & Simard, M. M. (1981). Women and “hopeless” congressional candidates: Nomination frequency, 1916–1978. American Politics Quarterly, 9, 449466.
  • Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (2003). Experimental design and causality in social psychological research. In C.Sanson, C. C.Morf, & A. T.Panter (Eds.), Handbook of methods in social psychology (pp. 235264). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530546.
  • Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993a). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels of office. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 503525.
  • Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993b). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119147.
  • Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2009). Women in national parliaments. Retrieved from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm
  • Judge, E. (2003, November 11). Women on board: Help or hindrance? The Times, p. 21.
  • Kulich, C., Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2009). The political glass cliff: Ethnic minorities in less winnable seats in the UK general elections. Manuscript in preparation, School of Business, University of Exeter .
  • Kulich, C., Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). Where is the romance for women leaders? The effects of gender on leadership attributions and performance-based pay. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 582601.
  • Labour Party. (2008). The cabinet. Retrieved from http://www.labour.org.uk/cabinet
  • Leeper, M. S. (1991). The impact of prejudice on female candidates: An experimental look at voter inference. American Politics Quarterly, 19, 24861.
  • Lovenduski, J. (2005). Feminizing politics. Cambridge , UK : Polity.
  • McDermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 895918.
  • McDougal, L. (1998). Westminster women. London : Vintage.
  • Norris, P., & Lovenduski, J. (1995). Political recruitment: Gender, race and class in the British Parliament. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Northern Ireland Assembly. (2009). Membership of the Northern Ireland Assembly. Retrieved from http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/members/membership07.htm
  • Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2006). Breaking the political glass ceiling: Women and congressional elections. New York : Routledge.
  • Rosenwasser, S. M., & Dean, N. G. (1989). Gender role and political office: Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 7785.
  • Ross, K. (2002). Women's place in “male” space: Gender and effect in parliamentary contexts. Parliamentary Affairs, 55, 189201.
  • Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding women's appointment to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549572.
  • Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16, 8190.
  • Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Think crisis—think female: Glass cliffs and contextual variation in the think manager—think male stereotype. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., Kulich, C., & Atkins, C. (2007). Opting out or pushed off the edge? The glass cliff and the precariousness of women's leadership positions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 266279.
  • Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Postmes, T. (2007). Reactions to the glass cliff: Gender differences in the explanations for the precariousness of women's leadership positions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 182197.
  • Sawer, M. (2000). Parliamentary representation of women: From discourses of justice to strategies of accountability. International Political Science Review, 21, 361380.
  • Scottish Parliament. (2009). List of current members. Retrieved from http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/apps2/MSP/MSPHome/
  • Shapiro, R. Y., & Mahajan, H. (1986). Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s and 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 4261.
  • Short, C. (1996). Women and the Labour Party. In J.Lovenduski & P.Norris (Eds.), Women in politics (pp. 1927). Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press.
  • Shvedova, N. (2005). Obstacles to women's participation in parliament. In J.Ballington & A.Karam (Eds.), Women in parliament: Beyond the numbers (pp. 3350). Stockholm , Sweden : IDEA International.
  • Stokes, W. (2005). Women in contemporary politics. Cambridge , UK : Polity.
  • UK Parliament. (2009). Members of Parliament by gender: Numbers. Retrieved from http://www.parliament.uk/directories/hciolists/gender.cfm