SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Halldorsdottir S, Karlsdottir SI. Empowerment or discouragement: women’s experience of caring and uncaring encounters during childbirth. Health Care Women Int 1996; 17: 36179.
  • 2
    Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD004667.
  • 3
    Werkmeister G, Jokinen M, Mahmood T, Newburn M. Making normal labour and birth a reality – developing a multi disciplinary consensus. Midwifery 2008; 24: 2569.
  • 4
    Tountas Y, Garanis TN, Dalla-Vorgia P. Health promotion, society and health care ethics. In Principles of Health Care Ethics (Gillon R ed.), 1994, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 84354.
  • 5
    Young AP. In the patient’s best interests: law and professional conduct. In Ethical Issues in Nursing (Hunt G ed.), 1994, Routledge, London, 16480.
  • 6
    Australian Council of Professions. Definition of a Profession. http://www.professions.com.au/Homepage.html (last accessed 10 April 2010).
  • 7
    Butler M, Fraser DM, Murphy RJL. What are the essential competencies required of a midwife at the point of registration? Midwifery 2008; 24: 2609.
  • 8
    Bluff R, Holloway I. The efficacy of midwifery role models. Midwifery 2008; 24: 30119.
  • 9
    Dickson N. A theory of caring for midwifery. ACMI J 1997; 10: 2328.
  • 10
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Published clinical guidelines. http://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CG/Published (last accessed 10 April 2010).
  • 11
    Mahran MA, Paine M, Ewies AAA. Maternity guidelines: aid or hindrance? J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 27: 77480.
  • 12
    Hunter B, Berg M, Lundgren I, Olafsdóttir OA, Kirkham M. Relationships: the hidden threads in the tapestry of maternity care. Midwifery 2008; 24: 1327.
  • 13
    Lundgren I, Dahlberg K. Midwives’ experience of the encounter with women and their pain during childbirth. Midwifery 2002; 18: 15564.
  • 14
    Byrom S, Downe S. “She sort of shines”: midwives’ accounts of good midwifery and good leadership. Midwifery 2010; 26: 12637.
  • 15
    Nicolls L, Webb C. What makes a good midwife? An integrative review of methodologically-diverse research. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56: 41429.
  • 16
    Page L. One-to-one midwifery: restoring the “with woman” relationship in midwifery. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003; 48: 11925.
  • 17
    Kagan P. Review of Walker and Avant’s newest theory development text. Nursing Sci Q 2006; 19: 1779.
  • 18
    Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing, 4th edn. 2004, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • 19
    Fahy KM, Parratt JA. Birth territory: a theory for midwifery practice. Women Birth 2006; 19: 4550.
  • 20
    Meleis AI. Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress, 4th edn. 2007, Williams & Wilkins, Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA.
  • 21
    Butcher HK. Review of Walker and Avant’s newest theory development text. Nursing Sci Q 2006; 19: 1747.
  • 22
    Halldorsdottir S, Karlsdottir SI. Journeying through labour and delivery: perceptions of women who have given birth. Midwifery 1996; 12: 4861.
  • 23
    Halldorsdottir S. Caring and Uncaring Encounters in Nursing and Health Care – Developing a Theory. (Dissertation). 1996, Linköping University, Linköping.
  • 24
    Karlsdottir SI. The Characteristics of Antenatal Services from Midwives, that Women are Satisfied or Unsatisfied with: A Descriptive Survey. (Unpublished MSc thesis). 1999, University of Manchester, Manchester.
  • 25
    Halldorsdottir S. Efling eða niðurbrot: kenning um samskiptahætti og áhrif þeirra (Empowerment or disempowerment: a theory of modes of being and communicating). Tímarit íslenskra hjúkrunarfræðinga (Icel J Nurs) 2003; 79: 1016.
  • 26
    Karlsdottir SI, Halldorsdottir S. Women’s sense of self and their experience of caring and uncaring encounters during pregnancy. Research presentation at The Nordic Midwifery Congress ‘Mothers of light: Gentle warriors from past to present. Midwifery care in the Nordic Countries’; 2004 May 20–22; Reykjavík.
  • 27
    Halldorsdottir S. Hjúkrun sem fagleg umhyggja: kynning á hjúkrunarkenningu. (Nuring as professional caring: introduction of a nursing theory). Tímarit hjúkrunarfræðinga – Ritrýndar fræðigreinar (Icel J Nurs: Peer-Reviewed Papers) 2006; 1: 211.
  • 28
    Lundgren I, Karlsdottir SI, Bondas T. Long-time memories and experiences of childbirth in a Nordic context – secondary analysis. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2009; 4: 11528.
  • 29
    Halldorsdottir S. The dynamics of the nurse–patient relationship: introduction of a synthesized theory from the patient’s perspective. Scand J Caring Sci 2008; 22: 64352.
  • 30
    Parry DC. Women’s lived experiences with pregnancy and midwifery in a medicalized and fetocentric context: six short stories. Qual Inq 2006; 12: 45971.
  • 31
    Maher J-M. Rethinking women’s birth experience: medical frameworks and personal narratives. Hecate 2003; 29: 14052.
  • 32
    Eliasson M, Kainz G, von Post I. Uncaring midwives. Nurs Ethics 2008; 15: 50011.
  • 33
    Huber US, Sandall J. A qualitative exploration of the creation of calm in a continuity of carer model of maternity care in London. Midwifery 2009; 25: 61321.
  • 34
    Hunter B. Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery. Midwifery 2004; 20: 26172.
  • 35
    Hunter B. Emotion work and boundary maintenance in hospital-based midwifery. Midwifery 2005; 21: 25366.
  • 36
    Waldenström U. Continuity of carer and satisfaction. Midwifery 1998; 14: 20713.
  • 37
    Gottvall K, Waldenström U. Does a traumatic birth experience have an impact on future reproduction? BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 109: 25460.
  • 38
    O’Cathain A, Thomas K, Walters SJ, Nicoll J, Kirkham M. Women’s perceptions of informed choice in maternity care. Midwifery 2002; 18: 13644.
  • 39
    Guilliland K, Pairman S. The midwifery partnership: a model for practice. NZ Coll Midwives J 1994; 16: 59.
  • 40
    International Confederation of Midwives (ICM). International Codes of Ethics. 2002, http://www.internationalmidwives.org (last accessed 10 April 2010).
  • 41
    Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council, Australian College of Midwives and Australian Nursing Federation. Code of Ethics for Midwives in Australia. http://www.midwives.org.au (last accessed 10 April 2010).
  • 42
    New Zealand College of Midwives. Code of Ethics. 2005, http://www.midwife.org.nz (last accessed 10 April 2010).
  • 43
    Freeman LM, Timperley H, Adair V. Partnership in midwifery care in New Zealand. Midwifery 2004; 20: 214.
  • 44
    Lundgren I. Swedish women’s experience of childbirth two years after birth. Midwifery 2005; 21: 34654.
  • 45
    Gibbins J, Thomson AM. Women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth. Midwifery 2001; 17: 30230.
  • 46
    Downe S. Normal Childbirth: Evidence and Debate. 2004, Churchill Livingstone, London.
  • 47
    Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Women’s lived experience of fear of childbirth. Midwifery 2009; 2: e19.
  • 48
    Hunter B, Segrott J. Re-mapping client journeys and professional identities: a review of the literature on clinical pathways. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 60825.
  • 49
    Ball L, Curtis P, Kirkham M. Why do Midwives Leave? Women’s Informed Childbearing and Health Research Group. 2002, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
  • 50
    Barclay L. Woman and midwives: position, problems and potential. Midwifery 2008; 24: 1321.
  • 51
    Waldenström U. Normal childbirth and evidence based practice. Women Birth 2007; 20: 17580.
  • 52
    Reiger K. Domination or mutual recognition? Professional subjectivity in midwifery and obstetrics. Social Theory Health 2008; 6: 13247.
  • 53
    Kirkham M. The Midwife–Woman Relationship. 2000, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
  • 54
    Kirkham M. Birth Center: A Social Model for Maternity Care. 2003, Books for Midwives, Oxford.
  • 55
    Thompson FE. Moving from codes of ethics to ethical relationships for midwifery practice. Nurs Ethics 2002; 9: 52236.