Discordant patterns of population structure for two co-distributed snake species across a fragmented Ontario landscape
Article first published online: 12 MAY 2010
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Diversity and Distributions
Volume 16, Issue 4, pages 571–581, July 2010
How to Cite
DiLeo, M. F., Row, J. R. and Lougheed, S. C. (2010), Discordant patterns of population structure for two co-distributed snake species across a fragmented Ontario landscape. Diversity and Distributions, 16: 571–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00667.x
- Issue published online: 10 JUN 2010
- Article first published online: 12 MAY 2010
- Assignment test;
- garter snake;
- habitat fragmentation;
- population structure;
Aim The goal of our study was to investigate the effects of a fragmented landscape on the genetic population structure of two sympatric snake species that differ in habitat preference. The eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis) is a common, habitat generalist, whereas the endangered eastern foxsnake (Mintonius [Elaphe] gloydi) is rarer, geographically restricted, and a marsh-specialist. We were most interested in comparing the genetic population structure of both species and identifying any natural and human-created features of the landscape that overlap with genetic disjunctions.
Location Southwestern Ontario, Canada, surveying over half of the remaining range of the eastern foxsnake.
Methods We utilized DNA microsatellite markers to examine genetic population structure of both species. The number of genetically distinct clusters for each species was determined using both Bayesian spatial assignment and spatial principal component analyses (sPCA). Genetic clusters were overlaid onto a habitat map to deduce possible physiognomic barriers to gene flow.
Results Spatial assignment revealed three genetic clusters for garter snakes and five for foxsnakes. Each individual garter snake had a near equal probability of membership to two or more clusters with no cluster mapping onto a discrete geographic region, indicating that garter snakes comprise a single genetic population. The identified foxsnake clusters correspond to geographically circumscribed locations on the landscape, roughly coincident with isolated patches of suitable habitat. sPCAs revealed significant global allelic structure for foxsnakes, but not for garter snakes. No significant local structure was found for either species.
Main Conclusions Our results imply that foxsnakes and garter snakes are differentially impacted by the same landscape or have dramatically different effective population sizes. Unsuitable intervening habitat such as agricultural tracts and roads between existing populations of foxsnakes appears to act as barriers to gene flow, while garter snake movement appears unrestricted by these features. Our findings have important implications for the management of eastern foxsnakes.