Get access
Advertisement

Selection for commercial forestry determines global patterns of alien conifer invasions

Authors

  • Franz Essl,

    Corresponding author
    1. The Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Canterbury, New Zealand
    2. Environment Agency Austria, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria
      Correspondence: Franz Essl, Environment Agency Austria, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
      E-mail: franz.essl@umweltbundesamt.at
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dietmar Moser,

    1. Environment Agency Austria, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stefan Dullinger,

    1. Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation and Landscape Ecology, Faculty Centre of Biodiversity, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria
    2. Vienna Institute for Nature Conservation & Analyses, Giessergasse 6/7, 1090 Vienna, Austria
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Thomas Mang,

    1. Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation and Landscape Ecology, Faculty Centre of Biodiversity, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria
    2. Vienna Institute for Nature Conservation & Analyses, Giessergasse 6/7, 1090 Vienna, Austria
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Philip E. Hulme

    1. The Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Canterbury, New Zealand
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence: Franz Essl, Environment Agency Austria, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
E-mail: franz.essl@umweltbundesamt.at

Abstract

Question  Are the patterns of alien conifer (Pinaceae, Cupressaceae) invasions different between continents, and how is invasion success influenced by commercial forestry practices?

Location  Temperate and subtropical countries and regions (n = 60) from five continents spanning both hemispheres.

Methods  We used generalized linear mixed models to test how continent identity, region area and use in commercial forestry affect probabilities of Pinaceae and Cupressaceae species to escape following introduction and cumulative logit regression models to assess how these predictors affect the likelihood that a species becomes naturalized or invasive.

Results  Sixty Pinaceae of a global total of 232 and 26 Cupressaceae of a total of 142 species have escaped from cultivation across the study regions examined. Average numbers of both alien Pinaceae and Cupressaceae species per region were highest in Oceania, followed by Africa. Moreover, the probability of alien Cupressaceae and Pinaceae becoming naturalized or invasive was particularly high in these two continents. For both families, species used in commercial forestry have a significantly higher probability of escape than those which are only introduced for ornamental or other purposes. In the case of Pinaceae, forestry species also become naturalized or invasive more frequently than non-forestry species, while no such effect was detectable for Cupressaceae.

Conclusions  We found that non-native conifers are more likely to escape from cultivation, naturalize and turn into invasive weeds on the continents of the Southern Hemisphere. In addition to this biogeographic signal, introduction effort strongly determines the behaviour of introduced Pinaceae, and less so, Cupressaceae. A clear conflict exists between the economic benefits of conifer forestry and the risks to the environment from invasions. Future expansion of commercial forestry should address spatial planning to ecosystems vulnerable to invasion and adopt comprehensive risk assessment procedures.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary