Get access

Conservation biogeography of the US–Mexico border: a transcontinental risk assessment of barriers to animal dispersal

Authors

  • Jesse R. Lasky,

    Corresponding author
    1. Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C0900, Austin, TX 78712-0253
      Jesse R. Lasky, Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C0900, Austin, TX 78712-0253, USA.
      E-mail: jesserlasky@mail.utexas.edu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Walter Jetz,

    1. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, Yale University, 165 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520
    2. Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0116, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Timothy H. Keitt

    1. Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C0900, Austin, TX 78712-0253
    Search for more papers by this author

Jesse R. Lasky, Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C0900, Austin, TX 78712-0253, USA.
E-mail: jesserlasky@mail.utexas.edu

Abstract

Aim  Humans have dramatically transformed landscapes along the US–Mexico border. We aim to assess the risk of barriers that may significantly impede animal migrations within this ecologically sensitive region.

Location  United States and Mexico.

Methods  We examined the intersection of current and possible future barriers along the border with the geographic ranges of 313 amphibian, reptile and non-volant mammal species. We considered the areas of intensive human land use and ∼ 600 km of pedestrian fence as current barriers along the border. We evaluated the impacts of two scenarios of dispersal barriers – continuation of existing and construction of new barriers – and identified species vulnerable to global and local extinction.

Results  Among the species most at risk from current barriers are four species listed as threatened globally or by both nations, 23 species for which the larger of their two national subranges is < 105 km2 and 29 species whose ranges cross the border only marginally. Three border regions, California, Madrean archipelago and Gulf coast, emerge as being of particular concern. These regions are characterized by high overall species richness and high richness of species at risk from existing barriers and from construction of potential new barriers.

Main conclusions  New barriers along the border would increase the number of species at risk, especially in the three identified regions, which should be prioritized for mitigation of the impacts of current barriers. The species we identified as being potentially at risk merit further study to determine impacts of border dispersal barriers.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary