Keep collecting: accurate species distribution modelling requires more collections than previously thought

Appendix S1 List of herbaria contributing tropical plant collection records accessed through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility and SpeciesLink.

Table S1 Number of collections in full dataset for each of the 65 study species

Table S2 Percent accordance (kappa) between species range maps produced using time-ordered data subsets versus the corresponding range maps produced using the full datasets. The 90% quantiles of kappa values for maps produced using random data subsets are listed in parentheses.

Table S3 Area of range maps produced using time-ordered data subsets relative to the corresponding range maps produced using the full datasets. The 90% quantiles of relative areas for maps produced using random data subsets are listed in parentheses.

Table S4 Degree of spatial aggregation exhibited by each species for each time-ordered data subset sample size.

Table S5 Proportion of full thermal niche breadth represented by time-ordered collection datasets.

Table S6 Proportion of full precipitation niche breadth represented by time-ordered collection datasets.

Table S7 Proportion of full seasonality of precipitation niche breadth represented by time-ordered collection datasets.

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Filename	Format	Size	Description
DDI_813_sm_AppS1.pdf		74K	Supporting info item
DDI_813_sm_TableS1-7.pdf		105K	Supporting info item

Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.