Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration
Article first published online: 8 AUG 2011
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Diversity and Distributions
Special Issue: Human-mediated introductions of Australian acacias - a global experiment in biogeography
Volume 17, Issue 5, pages 1015–1029, September 2011
How to Cite
Le Maitre, D. C., Gaertner, M., Marchante, E., Ens, E.-J., Holmes, P. M., Pauchard, A., O’Farrell, P. J., Rogers, A. M., Blanchard, R., Blignaut, J. and Richardson, D. M. (2011), Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration. Diversity and Distributions, 17: 1015–1029. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00816.x
- Issue published online: 8 AUG 2011
- Article first published online: 8 AUG 2011
- biodiversity loss;
- biological invasions;
- degradation ecology;
- ecosystem functions;
- ecosystem services;
- impact mechanisms;
- invasive species;
- seed banks;
- soil nutrients
Aim The biophysical impacts of invasive Australian acacias and their effects on ecosystem services are explored and used to develop a framework for improved restoration practices.
Location South Africa, Portugal and Chile.
Methods A conceptual model of ecosystem responses to the increasing severity (density and duration) of invasions was developed from the literature and our knowledge of how these impacts affect options for restoration. Case studies are used to identify similarities and differences between three regions severely affected by invasions of Australian acacias: Acacia dealbata in Chile, Acacia longifolia in Portugal and Acacia saligna in South Africa.
Results Australian acacias have a wide range of impacts on ecosystems that increase with time and disturbance, transform ecosystems and alter and reduce ecosystem service delivery. A shared trait is the accumulation of massive seed banks, which enables them to become dominant after disturbances. Ecosystem trajectories and recovery potential suggest that there are important thresholds in ecosystem state and resilience. When these are crossed, options for restoration are radically altered; in many cases, autogenic (self-driven and self-sustaining) recovery to a pre-invasion condition is inhibited, necessitating active intervention to restore composition and function.
Main conclusions The conceptual model demonstrates the degree, nature and reversibility of ecosystem degradation and identifies key actions needed to restore ecosystems to desired states. Control and restoration operations, particularly active restoration, require substantial short- to medium-term investments, which can reduce losses of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and the costs to society in the long term. Increasing restoration effectiveness will require further research into linkages between impacts and restoration. This research should involve scientists, practitioners and managers engaged in invasive plant control and restoration programmes, together with society as both the investors in, and beneficiaries of, more effective restoration.