Impacts of data quality on the setting of conservation planning targets using the species–area relationship
Version of Record online: 28 MAY 2012
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Diversity and Distributions
Volume 19, Issue 1, pages 1–13, January 2013
How to Cite
Metcalfe, K., Delavenne, J., Garcia, C., Foveau, A., Dauvin, J.-C., Coggan, R., Vaz, S., Harrop, S. R., Smith, R. J. (2013), Impacts of data quality on the setting of conservation planning targets using the species–area relationship. Diversity and Distributions, 19: 1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00921.x
- Issue online: 14 DEC 2012
- Version of Record online: 28 MAY 2012
- European Union under the Interreg IVA Programme
- European Regional Development
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
|ddi921-sup-0001-FigureS1-TableS1-S4.docx||Word document||498K||Figure S1 Broad-scale EUNIS level 3 marine habitat map. Table S1 Key to EUNIS codes, levels, and descriptions. Table S2 Species richness estimates calculated using the ICE, Chao2, Jackknife1, Jackknife2 and Bootstrap estimators. Table S3 Number of sampling points required to reach stable estimates of species richness for the ICE, Chao2, Jackknife1, Jackknife2 and Bootstrap estimators of species richness. Table S4 Habitat-specific z-values calculated using the ICE, Chao2, Jackknife1, Jackknife2 and Bootstrap estimators of species richness.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.