SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • degradation;
  • dietary restriction;
  • longevity;
  • proteotoxicity;
  • ribosome;
  • target of rapamycin;
  • translation

Summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling and translation: a conserved longevity pathway
  5. Is protein translation involved in the response to dietary restriction (DR)?
  6. Potential mechanisms of longevity control via regulation of protein translation
  7. Translation, TOR signaling, and aging in mammals
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. References

The important role that regulation of protein translation plays in determining longevity in invertebrate organisms became widely appreciated in 2007, with the publication of several papers discussed in last year's review. During 2008, several studies have further strengthened the idea that regulation of translation is one component of a highly evolutionarily conserved pathway that modifies longevity. Importantly, studies published this year also began to provide insights into specific mechanisms by which altered mRNA translation does (and in some cases does not) slow aging in invertebrate model organisms.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling and translation: a conserved longevity pathway
  5. Is protein translation involved in the response to dietary restriction (DR)?
  6. Potential mechanisms of longevity control via regulation of protein translation
  7. Translation, TOR signaling, and aging in mammals
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. References

Protein translation is a complex, highly regulated process with a central role in regulating cell function and homeostasis. Therefore, it is not news that health and longevity are dependent on appropriate regulation of translation throughout life. More surprising, however, are the recent observations made by multiple laboratories that perturbing the function of individual components of the key translational machinery can result in substantial increases in lifespan. Indeed, as described in succeeding discussions, modulation of translation in response to nutrient availability appears to be one of the best conserved longevity pathways across invertebrate organisms.

Target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling and translation: a conserved longevity pathway

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling and translation: a conserved longevity pathway
  5. Is protein translation involved in the response to dietary restriction (DR)?
  6. Potential mechanisms of longevity control via regulation of protein translation
  7. Translation, TOR signaling, and aging in mammals
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. References

Over the past several years, a small number of orthologous proteins have become recognized as conserved longevity modifiers (Kaeberlein, 2007; Kennedy, 2008). These include sirtuins, the TOR kinase, insulin-like receptors, and FOXO-family transcription factors. It has remained unclear, however, whether these isolated cases were truly indicative of conserved pathways modulating longevity conserved across eukaryotic kingdoms as quantitative evidence was lacking.

A study published this year in Genome Research used the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, two organisms separated by approximately 1.5 billion years of evolution, to provide a quantitative evaluation of the degree to which genetic modifiers of aging are conserved (Smith et al., 2008). By analysis of gene sequence, yeast orthologs and homologs were identified that correspond to approximately 300 known worm aging genes (defined as genes whose reduced function leads to increased lifespan), and yeast replicative lifespan was then measured for all nonessential single-gene deletion strains. From this comprehensive analysis, 25 long-lived yeast deletions were identified, each representing a conserved ortholog/homolog pair between yeast and worms. This proportion is significantly higher than the fraction of yeast aging genes identified by randomly screening deletions strains (Kaeberlein et al., 2005), providing quantitative evidence for conserved longevity pathways across these two widely separated species. Of particular relevance for this review is the observation that at least 8 of the 25 conserved longevity genes are known to modulate protein translation and are likely to function in a single conserved longevity pathway downstream of TOR, a nutrient-responsive kinase (see (Wullschleger et al., 2006) for review). These conserved longevity genes, each with a known effect on translation, include TOR, S6 kinase (S6K), ribosomal proteins of the large subunit, and translation initiation factors (Table 1).

Table 1.  Conserved longevity modifying genes that influence protein translation
YeastWormFlyMouse
  1. Several genes that regulate protein translation have been reported to modulate longevity in two or more organisms. Putative orthologs for these genes are shown below. Shading indicates published data demonstrating a role for that gene in aging of the noted organism. †Our unpublished data.

TOR1let-363dTORmTOR
KOG1daf-15 Raptor
SCH9rsks-1dS6KRPS6KB1
RPL19Arpl-19RpL19RPL19
RPL22Arpl-22RpL22RPL22
RPL6Brpl-6RpL6RPL6
RPL9Arpl-9RpL9RPL9
TIF1inf-1eIF-4AEIF4A2, EIF4A1
TIF2inf-1eIF-4AEIF4A2, EIF4A1
TIF4631ifg-1eIF4GEIF4G1, EIF4G3

Although TOR signaling and regulation of translation initiation are conserved longevity control mechanisms shared between yeast and worms, it is interesting to note that the mechanisms by which reduced ribosome biogenesis influences longevity may be somewhat different in the two species. A functional ribosome is composed of two multiprotein subunits, a 40S ‘small’ subunit and a 60S ‘large’ subunit. In C. elegans, RNAi knock-down of ribosomal proteins or rRNA processing factors that mediate production of either ribosomal subunit is associated with increased lifespan (Chen et al., 2007; Curran & Ruvkun, 2007; Hansen et al., 2007). In yeast, in contrast, the large ribosomal subunit seems to be much more important for longevity than the small subunit (Steffen et al., 2008) (see below), with potential exceptions (Chiocchetti et al., 2007). Whether these differences reflect overlapping or entirely different downstream mechanisms of longevity control in yeast and worms is currently unknown.

Is protein translation involved in the response to dietary restriction (DR)?

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling and translation: a conserved longevity pathway
  5. Is protein translation involved in the response to dietary restriction (DR)?
  6. Potential mechanisms of longevity control via regulation of protein translation
  7. Translation, TOR signaling, and aging in mammals
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. References

Three sets of observations from studies of yeast, worms, and flies suggest that DR slows aging by altering protein synthesis in response to reduced TOR signaling. First, TOR activity is reduced by DR (Takeshige et al., 1992; Morck & Pilon, 2006; Juhasz et al., 2007). Second, inhibition of TOR is sufficient to increase lifespan (Vellai et al., 2003; Jia et al., 2004; Kapahi et al., 2004; Kaeberlein et al., 2005; Powers et al., 2006). Lastly, several TOR-regulated translation factors play a conserved longevity-modifying role (Fabrizio et al., 2001).

Epistasis analysis of replicative lifespan in yeast clearly places TOR1, SCH9 [yeast S6K (Urban et al., 2007)], and ribosomal proteins in the same pathway as DR (Steinkraus et al., 2008), indicating that TOR signaling and TOR-regulated translation factors mediate lifespan extension by dietary restriction in this organism. In C. elegans, however, the genetic relationships between TOR signaling, protein translation, and DR appear to be more complex. Similar to the case in yeast, inhibition of TOR signaling fails to further increase the lifespan of worms subjected to DR (Hansen et al., 2007). Epistasis analyses, however, indicate that rsks-1 (S6K) and translation initiation factors map to a group different from the group that contains TOR and DR (Hansen et al., 2008). One explanation that has been proposed is that whereas DR leads to reduced protein synthesis via reduced TOR activity, the lifespan extension observed from knock-down of S6K and other protein synthesis factors in well-fed animals occurs via a different mechanism (Hansen et al., 2008).

Despite the appeal of a simple linear model with TOR and translation downstream of DR, recent data are emerging to suggest that more complex models are likely to be required to explain the underlying biology. For example, although it is certainly the case that TOR signaling is reduced by DR, there is also evidence that TOR activity and protein synthesis are reduced during normal aging. For example, Linford and colleagues ( 2007) have reported that the transcriptional profile of aging mice is indicative of reduced TOR signaling and that DR attenuates this age-associated reduction in TOR activity. A similar trend is observed during replicative aging in yeast, where a reduction in transcription of ribosomal components and translation factors is observed in aged cells (Yiu et al., 2008).

Models of longevity regulation that present protein translation as the primary downstream target of TOR signaling must confront evidence that TOR has multiple additional outputs that have also been implicated in longevity control. For example, autophagy, previously shown to be required for lifespan extension in response to reduced signaling through the insulin and IGF-I signal pathways, is also regulated by TOR signaling (Melendez et al., 2003). Autophagy is induced by DR (Takeshige et al., 1992; Morck & Pilon, 2006; Juhasz et al., 2007), and three recent studies have indicated that this TOR-mediated induction of autophagy is required for increased lifespan (Hansen et al., 2008; Jia and Lev). Similar to the effect in a long-lived daf-2 mutant, RNAi knock-down of essential autophagy genes (including the beclin ortholog bec-1, the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase vps-34, or yeast ATG7 ortholog atg-7) is sufficient to prevent lifespan extension in a genetic model of DR, mutation of eat-2. It remains to be determined, however, whether this requirement for autophagy is general for other methods of DR in C. elegans, such as bacterial deprivation during adulthood, and whether autophagy is essential for lifespan extension in a variety of different organisms. Interestingly, Hansen et al. (Hansen et al., 2007) provide additional evidence that induction of autophagy is not sufficient to promote longevity in C. elegans, and that mutation of S6K does not induce autophagy. Taken together, these observations may suggest that the lifespan extension associated with DR is likely to require multiple TOR-regulated outputs, including both enhanced autophagy and altered protein synthesis.

In yeast, nutrient signaling kinases including TOR and PKA, when active, inhibit the activity of transcription factors such as Msn2 and Msn4 by maintaining them in the cytoplasm. Reduced TOR or PKA signaling leads to nuclear accumulation of Msn2/4 and activation of target genes (Smith et al., 1998; Beck & Hall, 1999). A recent report finds that yeast replicative lifespan extension in the tor1Δ requires MSN2/4 (Medvedik et al., 2007), suggesting a translation-independent mode of lifespan modulation by TOR. The authors go on to report that activation of Msn2/4 leads eventually to increased Sir2 activity, although this was not found by another group (Kaeberlein et al., 2005). Similarly, yeast chronological lifespan extension by sch9Δ or tor1Δ has recently been reported to require the Rim15 kinase (Fabrizio et al., 2003; Wei et al., 2008), which activates Msn2/4 and another stress-responsive transcription factor, Gis1 (Pedruzzi et al., 2000; Cameroni et al., 2004).

Potential mechanisms of longevity control via regulation of protein translation

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling and translation: a conserved longevity pathway
  5. Is protein translation involved in the response to dietary restriction (DR)?
  6. Potential mechanisms of longevity control via regulation of protein translation
  7. Translation, TOR signaling, and aging in mammals
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. References

More efficient allocation of resources to promote longevity

When considering how altered translation might lead to increased lifespan, one obvious hypothesis is that decreased translation simply reflects a more efficient usage of cellular energy and resources. Protein synthesis requires a large amount of adenosine triphosphate, and has been estimated in amphibians to account for at least 10% of total metabolic rate and greater than 10% of total energy consumption (Fuery et al., 1998). In yeast, a ribosome biogenesis alone may account for 50% of the transcription in the cell (Warner et al., 2001). It is reasonable to speculate that reduced protein synthesis might allow a higher percentage of cellular resources to be allocated to pro-longevity maintenance pathways, perhaps accompanied by a reduction in allocation of resources to reproduction. Such a trade-off may account for a portion of the longevity effects associated with reduced insulin/IGF-like signaling (IIS) or DR (Partridge et al., 2005), and this idea is consistent with the observation that C. elegans with reduced S6K or ifg-1 activity also shows a reduction in fecundity (Pan et al., 2007). However, at least in certain cases, the longevity benefit of DR or reduced insulin signaling may be separable from the reproductive costs (Piper et al., 2008). The extent to which these phenotypes may be separable in long-lived translation mutants is unknown.

Differential translation of a subset of longevity-modulating mRNAs

A second potential mechanism by which altered protein translation could modulate longevity is by differentially influencing the production of a small number of key longevity control proteins. Although a majority of mRNAs are expected to be translated less efficiently in translation-deficient long-lived animals, one or more mRNAs coding for longevity-promoting proteins may be translated at their normal levels (or possibly even more efficiently) under conditions where translation initiation is impaired.

One specific example of such a mechanism was described recently in the yeast replicative aging system (Steffen et al., 2008). Gcn4 is a starvation-responsive transcription factor that is post-transcriptionally regulated via upstream open reading frames present in the Gcn4 5′-UTR (Hinnebusch, 2005). Under nutrient-replete conditions, when translation is highly active, translation of the Gcn4 open reading frame is negligible; however, under conditions where translation initiation is reduced (leading to less efficient translation of most mRNAs), translation of Gcn4 is enhanced. Gcn4 translation is also enhanced when 60S but not 40S ribosomal subunit abundance is reduced (Steffen et al., 2008). The lifespan extensions associated with deletion of several different ribosomal large subunit genes, SCH9 (yeast S6K) or TOR1 are all attenuated in cells lacking Gcn4.

The role of Gcn4 as a transcription factor, combined with the requirement of increased Gcn4 expression for lifespan extension, suggests that one or more Gcn4 target genes are likely to contribute to the enhanced longevity observed in translation-deficient yeast cells. In addition to regulating amino acid biosynthetic genes, Gcn4 targets include genes involved in purine biosynthesis, autophagy, ER stress response, and mitochondrial function (Jia et al., 2000; Natarajan et al., 2001; Patil et al., 2004). Gcn4 orthologs are present in invertebrates and mammals, contain 5′-UTR upstream open reading frames, and appear to have similar functions (Hinnebusch, 2005). An important goal for future studies will be to determine whether these orthologs also modulate longevity in multicellular eukaryotes.

Post-transcriptional regulation of Gcn4 is one example of how differential translation of a specific mRNA can contribute to longevity control. It is also possible that differential translation of entire classes of gene products could be altered in response to reduced TOR signaling, inhibition of translation initiation, or altered abundance of ribosomal subunits. For example, certain types of mRNAs may be more or less efficiently translated under specific translation states based on their structural features or subcellular localization (e.g. endoplasmic reticulum-associated translation).

Perhaps most intriguing is the possibility that distinct varieties of ribosomes, each with its own constituent protein composition, might be active within the cell at the same time. In support, recent evidence in yeast suggests specific roles for individual ribosomal subunits multiple aspects of translational regulation (Komili et al., 2007). Such a model suggests that variant subunit compositions (e.g. lacking one ribosomal protein or containing a ribosomal protein or RNA with differential post-translational modifications) confer differential affinity for translation of subsets of target mRNAs. Mutations that alter the abundance or activity of individual ribosomal proteins or ribosomal processing factors may alter relative abundance of ribosomal subtypes and influence longevity in this manner. Clearly, much work needs to be done to clarify the importance of differential mRNA translation in aging.

Improved protein homeostasis

One of the questions posed in last year's Hot Topics review of protein translation in aging (Kaeberlein & Kennedy, 2007) was whether improved protein homeostasis might account for some or all of the longevity benefits associated with reduced translation. During 2008, evidence has continued to accumulate, suggesting that longevity and resistance to proteotoxicity are correlated, and the hypothesis that proteotoxicity may underlie many features of aging continues to gain momentum. This correlation is particularly apparent in C. elegans, where several different longevity-associated genes have been shown to influence aggregation of transgenically expressed toxic peptides (Cohen et al., 2006; Curran et al., 2007; Hsu et al., 2003).

Particularly noteworthy, in this regard, was the observation that DR is sufficient to substantially delay age-associated paralysis caused by proteotoxicity in transgenic nematode models of polyglutamine disease and amyloid beta disease (Steinkraus et al., 2008). This effect was shown both for environmental dietary restriction [bacterial food deprivation (Kaeberlein et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2006)] and for several genetic models of dietary restriction. In this study (Steinkraus et al., 2008), DR was also shown to suppress similar phenotypes using a generic proteotoxicity model in which an aggregation-prone form of GFP (GFP-degron) is expressed in body wall muscle cells (Link et al., 2006). These observations can be interpreted to suggest that DR acts by increasing resistance to a variety of different proteotoxic insults.

Like DR, RNAi knock-down of the insulin/IGF-1-like (‘IIS’) receptor daf-2, which had been previously shown to reduce amyloid beta-induced proteotoxicity (Cohen et al., 2006), is also sufficient to reduce polyglutamine- and GFP-degron-induced proteotoxicity (Steinkraus et al., 2008). The genetic relationship between IIS and DR with respect to proteotoxicity parallels their relationship with respect to longevity: (1) effects of reduced daf-2 activity require the FOXO family transcription factor daf-16, whereas effects of DR do not, and (2) combining daf-2(RNAi) with DR leads to an apparent additive phenotypic response. Interestingly, however, both daf-2(RNAi) and DR require the heat shock transcription factor, hsf-1, to increase lifespan and suppress proteotoxicity (Hsu et al., 2003; Steinkraus et al., 2008). This observation could be interpreted to suggest that both interventions act on aging and resistance to proteotoxicity via a common downstream mechanism involving enhanced chaperone activity and improved protein folding. Alternatively, the phenotypic suppression associated with hsf-1(RNAi) may reflect a secondary effect that is mechanistically distinct from the pro-longevity and antiproteotoxicity effects of these interventions.

Is the suppression of proteotoxity observed in response to DR or daf-2(RNAi) related to altered protein translation? This question is still unanswered; however, as pointed out in last year's review (Kaeberlein & Kennedy, 2007), reduced protein translation might be expected to improve protein homeostasis by reducing the flux of proteins through endogenous repair and degradation pathways. It is also possible that protein repair or degradation machinery may be differentially translated under conditions of reduced ribosome biogenesis or translation initiation. In this regard, it is worth noting that in many eukaryotes (including yeast, worms, and humans), at least one of the genes coding for ubiquitin is expressed as a fusion protein with a ribosomal protein (Catic & Ploegh, 2005). Ribosomal protein expression is known to be regulated by TOR and S6K, and it is likely that ribosomal protein levels are tightly coupled to overall translation state. Thus, the highly conserved coexpression of ubiquitin and ribosomal proteins may serve as one mechanism to link proteasomal activity with global protein synthesis.

Translation, TOR signaling, and aging in mammals

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling and translation: a conserved longevity pathway
  5. Is protein translation involved in the response to dietary restriction (DR)?
  6. Potential mechanisms of longevity control via regulation of protein translation
  7. Translation, TOR signaling, and aging in mammals
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. References

It is clear that TOR signaling and translation control are central determinants of longevity in invertebrates; indeed, other than DR, a reduction in TOR signaling is the only intervention shown to increase lifespan in both of the yeast aging paradigms (replicative and chronological), as well as in nematodes and fruit flies. The importance of this pathway in mammalian aging has yet to be determined. In the absence of mammalian longevity data, however, there is reason to be optimistic that reduced TOR signaling may be beneficial for a variety of age-associated diseases in mammals. For example, mice treated with rapamycin show resistance to cancer, neurodegeneration, and cardiac disease (Gao et al., 2006; Wullschleger et al., 2006). Additionally, S6 kinase knockout mice show phenotypes consistent with a genetic mimic of dietary restriction, including improved insulin sensitivity, reduced adiposity and resistance to age-associated obesity (Um et al., 2004). There is also emerging data that inhibition of TOR is likely to have beneficial health effects in humans. Rapamycin (Sirolimus, Wyeth, Madison, NJ, USA) is used clinically as an immunosuppressant and to prevent coronary stent restenosis (Cheng-Lai & Frishman, 2004), and is also in clinical trials as an anticancer therapeutic (Weil, 2008). It is noteworthy that reduced age-associated cancer incidence is a primary feature of DR in rodents, suggesting that rapamycin mimics at least some DR phenotypes in humans. It will be of great interest to determine whether rapamycin exposure can prevent or treat other age-associated human diseases.

The mechanistic explanations underlying these beneficial effects are likely to be complicated, and the consequences of reduced TOR or SK6 activity may well be different from tissue to tissue. Moreover, crosstalk with the insulin/IGF-1 pathway (and other pathways) occurs at multiple levels. For instance, insulin stimulation results in Akt-dependent TOR activation and phosphorylation of S6 kinase [see (Um et al., 2006) for review]. In addition, S6 kinase phosphorylates insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) and dampens insulin signaling (Um et al., 2004). With respect to longevity or age-related disease, it will be necessary to determine whether beneficial interventions in either pathway (IIS and TOR) are attributable to canonical downstream targets (e.g. translation initiation with S6 kinase), or alternately to effects on other pathways through cross-regulation. One recent report, for example, finds that rates of protein synthesis are not appreciably decreased in myoblast cultures isolated from mice lacking S6 kinase activity, even though the myoblasts were smaller and the myofiber size is reduced in vivo (Ohanna et al., 2005; Mieulet et al., 2007). Whether this in vitro model accurately reflects the situation in vivo or in other tissues remains to be determined.

It is of vital importance to know whether reduced TOR activity enhances longevity in mammals. Fortunately, initial longevity experiments with mice fed a diet supplemented with rapamycin are well underway as part of the National Institute on Aging Interventions Testing Program (Miller et al., 2007), and results should be available soon. In the last few years, the relationship between protein translation and aging has begun to come into sharper focus. The next few years should see increasingly successful efforts to elucidate the mechanisms underlying enhanced longevity resulting from reduced TOR signaling and/or translation initiation, as well as a better understanding of whether these pathways are therapeutic targets for age-related disease.

Acknowledgments

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling and translation: a conserved longevity pathway
  5. Is protein translation involved in the response to dietary restriction (DR)?
  6. Potential mechanisms of longevity control via regulation of protein translation
  7. Translation, TOR signaling, and aging in mammals
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. References

We thank Richard Miller (University of Michigan) and Colin Selman (University of Aberdeen) for helpful comments on the manuscript. Studies related to this topic in the Kaeberlein and Kennedy labs are funded by a grant to B.K.K. and M.K. from the Ellison Medical Foundation, a research grant to M.K. from the American Federation for Aging Research and the Glenn Foundation, and by NIH Grant R01 AG025549 to B.K.K. M.K. is an Ellison Medical Foundation New Scholar in Aging.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling and translation: a conserved longevity pathway
  5. Is protein translation involved in the response to dietary restriction (DR)?
  6. Potential mechanisms of longevity control via regulation of protein translation
  7. Translation, TOR signaling, and aging in mammals
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. References