Normative contrast sensitivity values for the back-lit Melbourne Edge Test and the effect of visual impairment
Article first published online: 19 OCT 2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00248.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Eperjesi, F., Wolffsohn, J., Bowden, J., Napper, G. and Rubinstein, M. (2004), Normative contrast sensitivity values for the back-lit Melbourne Edge Test and the effect of visual impairment. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 24: 600–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00248.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 OCT 2004
- Article first published online: 19 OCT 2004
- Received: 22 March 2004 Revised form: 16 July, 8 August 2004 Accepted: 10 August 2004
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- contrast sensitivity;
- low vision;
- Melbourne Edge Test;
- normative values;
- visual impairment
Abstract
Background: The Melbourne Edge Test (MET) is a portable forced-choice edge detection contrast sensitivity (CS) test. The original externally illuminated paper test has been superseded by a backlit version. The aim of this study was to establish normative values for age and to assess change with visual impairment.
Method: The MET was administered to 168 people with normal vision (18–93 years old) and 93 patients with visual impairment (39–97 years old). Distance visual acuity (VA) was measured with a log MAR chart.
Results: In those eyes without disease, MET CS was stable until the age of 50 years (23.8 ± 0.7 dB) after which it decreased at a rate of ≈1.5 dB per decade. Compared with normative values, people with low vision were found to have significantly reduced CS, which could not be totally accounted for by reduced VA.
Conclusions: The MET provides a quick and easy measure of CS, which highlights a reduction in visual function that may not be detectable using VA measurements.

1475-1313/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=0d151d80eca5d91a7844dbe3f729615524c2dc6d)
1475-1313/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=4a5b3eac832c981b6e89fefc6d6c676aabca3292)
