Continuity and change: (re)constructing environmental geographies in late Soviet and post-Soviet Russia
Article first published online: 13 APR 2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00726.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Graybill, J. K. (2007), Continuity and change: (re)constructing environmental geographies in late Soviet and post-Soviet Russia. Area, 39: 6–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00726.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 13 APR 2007
- Article first published online: 13 APR 2007
- Revised manuscript received 12 December 2006
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Russia;
- transformation;
- history of geography;
- nature–society interactions;
- science studies
Environmental studies conducted worldwide often overlook the knowledge traditions of the locales where they are conducted. Addressing this issue, I investigated the geographic journal literature of late Soviet (1980–1989) and post-Soviet (1990–2003) Russia. Notable trends are increasing criticism of environmental and resource management in Russia and a (re)turn to pre-socialist Russian theorizations of society–nature interactions. Specifically, the noösphere, ethnogenesis and geosystems are trends in the literature that signify how Russian geographers (re)construct environmental knowledge. For non-Russian geographers working in Russia, awareness of these trends situates place-based knowledge relative to multiple cultures (ethnic, scientific) and time periods, promoting cross-cultural understanding of different traditions of geographic inquiry.

1475-4762/asset/AREA_left.gif?v=1&s=186e8a04da22e1942f49e71d928c91a704c972f1)
1475-4762/asset/AREA_right.gif?v=1&s=6aa22a1b6f31cf2f2251fb84f62e8bb4764ffba1)
