SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Adam Feltz, Melissa Millan, An error theory for compatibilist intuitions, Philosophical Psychology, 2015, 28, 4, 529

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Kelly McCormick, Companions in innocence: defending a new methodological assumption for theorizing about moral responsibility, Philosophical Studies, 2015, 172, 2, 515

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Jonathan Phillips, Alex Shaw, Manipulating Morality: Third-Party Intentions Alter Moral Judgments by Changing Causal Reasoning, Cognitive Science, 2015, 39, 1
  4. 4
    Peter Schulte, Beyond Verbal Disputes: The Compatibilism Debate Revisited, Erkenntnis, 2014, 79, 3, 669

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Dylan Murray, Eddy Nahmias, Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2014, 88, 2
  6. 6
    Davide Rigoni, Marcel Brass, From Intentions to Neurons: Social and Neural Consequences of Disbelieving in Free Will, Topoi, 2014, 33, 1, 5

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Adam Feltz, Florian Cova, Moral responsibility and free will: A meta-analysis, Consciousness and Cognition, 2014, 30, 234

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Oisín Deery, Why people believe in indeterminist free will, Philosophical Studies, 2014,

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Jason Turner, (Metasemantically) Securing Free Will, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2013, 91, 2, 295

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    GUNNAR BJöRNSSON, KARL PERSSON, A Unified Empirical Account of Responsibility Judgments, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2013, 87, 3
  11. 11
    Chris Weigel, Experimental evidence for free will revisionism, Philosophical Explorations, 2013, 16, 1, 31

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Adam Feltz, Edward Cokely, Predicting Philosophical Disagreement, Philosophy Compass, 2013, 8, 10
  13. 13
    Felipe De Brigard, William J. Brady, The Effect of What We Think may Happen on our Judgments of Responsibility, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2013, 4, 2, 259

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    David Rose, Shaun Nichols, The Lesson of Bypassing, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2013, 4, 4, 599

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Karl Persson, The right perspective on responsibility for ill health, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2013, 16, 3, 429

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    S. Lloyd, A Turing test for free will, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2012, 370, 1971, 3597

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Adina L. Roskies, DON’T PANIC: SELF-AUTHORSHIP WITHOUT OBSCURE METAPHYSICS, Philosophical Perspectives, 2012, 26, 1
  18. 18
    Joshua Knobe, Wesley Buckwalter, Shaun Nichols, Philip Robbins, Hagop Sarkissian, Tamler Sommers, Experimental Philosophy, Annual Review of Psychology, 2012, 63, 1, 81

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Eric Mandelbaum, David Ripley, Explaining the Abstract/Concrete Paradoxes in Moral Psychology: The NBAR Hypothesis, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2012, 3, 3, 351

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Joshua Shepherd, Free will and consciousness: Experimental studies, Consciousness and Cognition, 2012, 21, 2, 915

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Eddy Nahmias, Free will and responsibility, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2012, 3, 4
  22. 22
    Adina L Roskies, How does the neuroscience of decision making bear on our understanding of moral responsibility and free will?, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2012, 22, 6, 1022

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Gunnar Björnsson, Karl Persson, The Explanatory Component of Moral Responsibility, Noûs, 2012, 46, 2
  24. 24
    Chris Weigel, Distance, anger, freedom: An account of the role of abstraction in compatibilist and incompatibilist intuitions, Philosophical Psychology, 2011, 24, 6, 803

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    S. Nichols, Experimental Philosophy and the Problem of Free Will, Science, 2011, 331, 6023, 1401

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Jason S. Miller, Adam Feltz, Frankfurt and the folk: An experimental investigation of Frankfurt-style cases, Consciousness and Cognition, 2011, 20, 2, 401

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Kimberly R. Laurene, Richard F. Rakos, Marie S. Tisak, Allyson L. Robichaud, Michael Horvath, Perception of Free Will: The Perspective of Incarcerated Adolescent and Adult Offenders, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2011, 2, 4, 723

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Eric Schulz, Edward T. Cokely, Adam Feltz, Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: A test of the expertise defense, Consciousness and Cognition, 2011, 20, 4, 1722

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Eddy Nahmias, Why ‘Willusionism’ Leads to ‘Bad Results’: Comments on Baumeister, Crescioni, and Alquist, Neuroethics, 2011, 4, 1, 17

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Tamler Sommers, Experimental Philosophy and Free Will, Philosophy Compass, 2010, 5, 2
  31. 31
    Adina L. Roskies, How Does Neuroscience Affect Our Conception of Volition?, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2010, 33, 1, 109

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    HAGOP SARKISSIAN, AMITA CHATTERJEE, FELIPE DE BRIGARD, JOSHUA KNOBE, SHAUN NICHOLS, SMITA SIRKER, Is Belief in Free Will a Cultural Universal?, Mind & Language, 2010, 25, 3
  33. 33
    Frank C. Keil, The Feasibility of Folk Science, Cognitive Science, 2010, 34, 5
  34. 34
    Adam Feltz, Edward T. Cokely, Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism, Consciousness and Cognition, 2009, 18, 1, 342

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    ADAM FELTZ, EDWARD T. COKELY, THOMAS NADELHOFFER, Natural Compatibilism versus Natural Incompatibilism: Back to the Drawing Board, Mind & Language, 2009, 24, 1
  36. 36
    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Trevor Kvaran, Eddy Nahmias, Temperament and intuition: A commentary on Feltz and Cokely, Consciousness and Cognition, 2009, 18, 1, 351

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Fiery Cushman, Liane Young, The Psychology of Dilemmas and the Philosophy of Morality, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2009, 12, 1, 9

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Eddy Nahmias, Scientific Challenges to Free Will,