You have free access to this content

MACROEVOLUTION AND MACROECOLOGY THROUGH DEEP TIME

  1. NICHOLAS J. BUTTERFIELD

Article first published online: 18 JAN 2007

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00613.x

Issue

Palaeontology

Palaeontology

Volume 50, Issue 1, pages 41–55, January 2007

Additional Information

How to Cite

BUTTERFIELD, N. J. (2007), MACROEVOLUTION AND MACROECOLOGY THROUGH DEEP TIME. Palaeontology, 50: 41–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00613.x

Author Information

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK; e-mail: njb1005@esc.cam.ac.uk

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 18 JAN 2007
  2. Article first published online: 18 JAN 2007
  3. Typescript received 24 July 2006; accepted in revised form 21 September 2006

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (181K)

References

  • ADAMS, D. G. and DUGGAN, P. S. 1999. Tansley Review, 107. Heterocyst and akinete differentiation in cyanobacteria. New Phytologist, 144, 3–33.
    Direct Link:
  • ALROY, J. 2002. How many named species are valid? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 3706–3711.
  • AMTHOR, J. E., GROTZINGER, J. P., SCHRÖDER, S., BOWRING, S. A., RAMEZANI, J., MARTIN, M. W. and MATTER, A. 2003. Extinction of Cloudina and Namacalathus at the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary in Oman. Geology, 31, 431–434.
  • ANBAR, A. D. and KNOLL, A. H. 2002. Proterozoic ocean chemistry and evolution: a bioinorganic bridge? Science, 297, 1137–1142.
  • BAMBACH, R. K. 1993. Seafood through time: changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology, 19, 372–397.
  • BAMBACH, R. K., BUSH, A. M. and ERWIN, D. H. 2007. Autecology and the realized ecospace of marine metazoa from the Ediacaran period to the Recent. Palaeontology, 50, 1–22.
    Direct Link:
  • BELL, G. and MOOERS, A. O. 1997. Size and complexity among multicellular organisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 60, 345–363.
    Direct Link:
  • BELL, T., NEWMAN, J. A., SILVERMAN, B. W., TURNER, S. L. and LILLEY, A. K. 2005. The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services. Nature, 435, 1157–1160.
  • BERNEY, C. and PAWLOWSKI, J. 2006. A molecular time-scale for eukaryote evolution recalibrated with the continuous microfossil record. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 1867–1872.
  • BERNEY, C., FAHRNI, J. and PAWLOWSKI, J. 2004. How many novel eukaryotic ‘kingdoms’? Pitfalls and limitations of environmental DNA surveys. BMC Biology, 2, doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-2-13.
  • BJERRUM, C. J. and CANFIELD, D. E. 2002. Ocean productivity before about 1.9 Gyr ago limited by phosphorus adsorption onto iron oxides. Nature, 417, 159–162.
  • BLACKWELL, M. and JONES, K. 1997. Taxonomic diversity and interactions of insect-associated ascomycetes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 689–699.
  • BONSALL, M. B., JANSEN, V. A. A. and HASSELL, M. P. 2004. Life history trade-offs assemble ecological guilds. Science, 306, 11–114.
  • BRASIER, M. D. 1992. Nutrient-enriched waters and the early skeletal fossil record. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 149, 621–629.
  • BRETT, C. E., IVANY, L. C. and SCHOPF, K. M. 1996. Coordinated stasis: an overview. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 127, 1–20.
  • BROCKS, J. J., LOGAN, G. A., BUICK, R. and SUMMONS, R. E. 1999. Archean molecular fossils and the early rise of eukaryotes. Science, 285, 1033–1036.
  • BROWN, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 269 pp.
  • BROWN, J. H., GILLOOLY, J. F., ALLEN, A. P., SAVAGE, V. M. and WEST, G. B. 2004. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 85, 1771–1789.
  • BUDD, G. E. and JENSEN, S. 2000. A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla. Biological Reviews, 75, 253–295.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 1997. Plankton ecology and the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic transition. Paleobiology, 23, 247–262.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 2000. Bangiomorpha pubescens n. gen., n. sp.: implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity and the Mesoproterozoic–Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes. Paleobiology, 26, 386–404.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 2001a. Ecology and evolution of the Cambrian plankton. 200–216. In ZHURAVLEV, A. Yu and RIDING, R. (eds). Ecology of the Cambrian radiation. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 525 pp.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 2001b. Cambrian food webs. 40–43. In BRIGGS, D. E. G. and CROWTHER, P. R. (eds). Palaeobiology II, a synthesis. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 583 pp.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 2003. Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian Explosion. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 43, 166–177.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 2004. A vaucheriacean alga from the middle Neoproterozoic of Spitsbergen: implications for the evolution of Proterozoic eukaryotes and the Cambrian explosion. Paleobiology, 30, 231–252.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 2005a. Reconstructing a complex early Neoproterozoic eukaryote, Wynniatt Formation, arctic Canada. Lethaia, 38, 155–169.
    Direct Link:
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 2005b. Probable Proterozic fungi. Paleobiology, 31, 165–182.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. and CHANDLER, F. W. 1992. Paleoenvironmental distribution of Proterozoic microfossils, with an example from the Agu Bay Formation, Baffin Island. Palaeontology, 35, 943–957.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. and RAINBIRD, R. H. 1998. Diverse organic-walled microfossils, including ‘possible dinoflagellates’, from the early Neoproterozoic of arctic Canada. Geology, 26, 963–966.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J., KNOLL, A. H. and SWETT, K. 1994. Paleobiology of the Neoproterozoic Svanbergfjellet Formation, Spitsbergen. Fossils and Strata, 34, 84 pp.
  • CANFIELD, D. E. and TESKE, A. 1996. Late Proterozoic rise in atmospheric oxygen concentration inferred from phylogenetic and sulphur-isotope studies. Nature, 382, 127–132.
  • CARROLL, S. B. 2001. Chance and necessity: the evolution of morphological complexity and diversity. Nature, 409, 1102–1109.
  • CATLING, D. C., GLEIN, C. R., ZAHNLE, K. J. and McKAY, C. P. 2005. Why O2 is required by complex life on habitable planets and the concept of planetary ‘oxygenation time’. Astrobiology, 5, 414–438.
  • CAVALIER-SMITH, T. 2002. The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 52, 7–76.
  • CAVALIER-SMITH, T. 2006. Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 361, 969–1006.
  • COHEN, J. E., JONSSON, T. and CARPENTER, S. R. 2003. Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 1781–1786.
  • DESMARAIS, D. J. et al. 2003. The NASA Astrobiology roadmap. Astrobiology, 3, 219–235.
  • DILCHER, D. 2000. Toward a new synthesis: major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 7030–7036.
  • DIMICHELE, W. A., BEHRENSMEYER, A. K., OLSZEWSKI, T. D., LABANDEIRA, C. C., PANDOLFI, J. M., WING, S. L. and BOBE, R. 2004. Long-term stasis in ecological assemblages: evidence from the fossil record. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 285–322.
  • DUFFY, J. E. 2002. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection. Oikos, 99, 201–219.
    Direct Link:
  • DUTKIEWICZ, A., VOLK, H., GEORGE, S. C., RIDLEY, J. and BUICK, R. 2006. Biomarkers from Huronian oil-bearing fluid inclusions: an uncontaminated record of life before the Great Oxidation Event. Geology, 34, 437–440.
  • ELSER, J. J., DOBBERFUHL, D., MacKAY, N. A. and SCHAMPEL, J. H. 1996. Organism size, life history, and N: P stoichiometry: towards a unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes. Bioscience, 46, 674–684.
  • ELSER, J. J., WATTS, J., SCHAMPEL, J. H. and FARMER, J. 2006. Early Cambrian food webs on a trophic knife-edge? A hypothesis and preliminary data from a modern stromatolite-based ecosystem. Ecology Letters, 9, 295–303.
    Direct Link:
  • ERWIN, D. H. 2000. Macroevolution is more than repeated rounds of microevolution. Evolution and Development, 2, 78–84.
    Direct Link:
  • FEDONKIN, M. A. 2003. The origin of the Metazoa in the light of the Proterozoic fossil record. Paleontological Research, 7, 9–41.
  • FENSTER, C. B., ARMBRUSTER, W. S., WILSON, P., DUDASH, M. R. and THOMSON, J. D. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 375–403.
  • FINLAY, B. J. 2002. Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science, 296, 1061–1063.
  • FINLAY, B. J., MABERLY, S. C. and COOPER, J. I. 1997. Microbial diversity and ecosystem function. Oikos, 80, 209–213.
  • FORTEY, R. A., BRIGGS, D. E. G. and WILLS, M. A. 1996. The Cambrian evolutionary ‘explosion’: decoupling cladogenesis from morphological disparity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 57, 13–33.
  • GNILOVSKAYA, M. B. 1990. Vendotaenids–Vendian metaphytes. 138–147. In SOKOLOV, B. S. and IWANOWSKI, A. B. (eds). The Vendian System, volume 1, Paleontology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 383 pp.
  • GODFRAY, H. C. J. and LAWTON, J. H. 2001. Scale and species numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 400–404.
  • GOGARTEN, J. P., DOOLITTLE, W. F. and LAWRENCE, J. G. 2002. Prokaryotic evolution in light of gene transfer. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 19, 2226–2238.
  • GOULD, S. J. 1985. The paradox of the first tier: an agenda for paleobiology. Paleobiology, 11, 2–12.
  • GRAZHDANKIN, D. 2004. Patterns of distribution in the Ediacaran biotas: facies versus biogeography and evolution. Paleobiology, 30, 203–221.
  • GREEN, J. and BOHANNAN, B. J. M. 2006. Spatial scaling of microbial biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 501–507.
  • GREEN, J., HOLMES, A. J., WESTOBY, M., OLIVER, I., BRISCOE, D., DANGERFIELD, M., GILLINGS, M. and BEATTIE, A. J. 2004. Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature, 432, 747–750.
  • GREY, K. 2005. Ediacaran palynology of Australia. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir, 31, 439 pp.
  • GREY, K., WALTER, M. R. and CALVER, C. R. 2003. Neoproterozoic biotic diversification: snowball earth or aftermath of the Acraman impact? Geology, 31, 459–462.
  • HAMM, C. E., MERKEL, R., SPRINGER, O., JURKOJC, P., MAIER, C., PRECHTEL, K. and SMETACEK, V. 2003. Architecture and material properties of diatom shells provide effective mechanical protection. Nature, 421, 841–843.
  • HARLIN, M. M. 1995. Changes in major plant groups following nutrient enrichment. 173–187. In McCOMB, A. J. (ed.). Eutrophic shallow estuaries and lagoons. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 240 pp.
  • HEDGES, S. B., BLAIR, J. E., VENTURI, M. L. and SHOE, J. L. 2004. A molecular timescale of eukaryote evolution and the rise of complex multicellular life. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 4(2), doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-2.
  • HOFFMAN, P. F., KAUFMAN, A. J., HALVERSON, G. P. and SCHRAG, D. P. 1998. A Neoproterozoic snowball earth. Science, 281, 1342–1346.
  • HOFMANN, H. J. 1976. Precambrian microflora, Belcher Islands, Canada: significance and systematics. Journal of Paleontology, 50, 1040–1073.
  • HOFMANN, H. J. 1999. Global distribution of the Proterozoic sphaeromorph acritarch Valeria lophostriata (Jankauskas). Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 16, 215–224.
  • HOFMANN, H. J., NARBONNE, G. M. and AITKEN, J. D. 1990. Ediacaran remains from intertillite beds in northwestern Canada. Geology, 18, 1199–1202.
  • HORNER-DEVINE, M. C., LAGE, M., HUGHES, J. B. and BOHANNAN, B. J. M. 2004. A taxa-area relationship for bacteria. Nature, 432, 750–753.
  • HOU, X.-G., ALDRIDGE, R. J., BERGSTRÖM, J., SIVETER, DAVID. J., SIVETER, DEREK, J. and FENG, X.-G. 2004. The Cambrian fossils of Chengjiang, China. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA, 233 pp.
  • HUA, H., PRATT, B. R. and ZHANG, L.-Y. 2003. Borings in Cloudina shells: complex predator-prey dynamics in the terminal Neoproterozoic. Palaios, 18, 454–459.
  • HUNTLEY, J. W., XIAO, S. and KOWALEWSKI, M. 2006. 1.3 Billion years of acritarch history: an empirical morphospace approach. Precambrian Research, 144, 52–68.
  • HUTCHINSON, G. E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist, 93, 145–159.
  • JABLONSKI, D. 2000. Micro- and macroevolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology. In Paleobiology, 26 (Supplement to No. 4, ERWIN, D. H. and WING, S. L. eds, Deep time, Paleobiology's perspective), 15–52.
  • JABLONSKI, D. 2005. Mass extinctions and macroevolution. Paleobiology, 31, 192–210.
  • JAKOBSEN, H. H. 2002. Escape of protists in predator-generated feeding currents. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 26, 271–281.
  • JAVAUX, E. J., KNOLL, A. H. and WALTER, M. R. 2003. Recognizing and interpreting the fossils of early eukaryotes. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 33, 75–94.
  • JENSEN, S. 2003. The Proterozoic and earliest Cambrian trace fossil record; patterns, problems and perspectives. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 43, 219–228.
  • JIANG, L., SCHOFIELD, O. M. E. and FALKOWSKI, P. G. 2005. Adaptive evolution of phytoplankton cell size. American Naturalist, 166, 496–505.
  • JUMARS, P. A., MAYER, L. M., DEMING, J. W., BAROSS, J. A. and WHEATCROFT, R. A. 1990. Deep-sea deposit-feeding strategies suggested by environmental and feeding constraints. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A, 331, 85–101.
  • KAUFMAN, A. J., KNOLL, A. H. and AWRAMIK, S. M. 1992. Biostratigraphic and chemostratigraphic correlation of Neoproterozoic sedimentary successions: upper Tindir Group, northwestern Canada, as a test case. Geology, 20, 181–185.
  • KERR, S. R. and DICKIE, L. M. 2001. The biomass spectrum. A predator-prey theory of aquatic production. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 320 pp.
  • KHOMENTOVSKII, V. V. and KARLOVA, G. A. 2005. The Tommotian Stage base as the Cambrian lower boundary in Siberia. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, 13, 21–34.
  • KIøRBOE, T., SAIZ, E. and VIITASALO, M. 1996. Prey switching behaviour in the planktonic copepod Acartia tonsa. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 143, 65–75.
  • KNOLL, A. H. 1992. The early evolution of eukaryotes: a geological perspective. Science, 256, 622–627.
  • KNOLL, A. H. 1994. Proterozoic and Early Cambrian protists: evidence for accelerating evolutionary tempo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 6743–6750.
  • KNOLL, A. H., JAVAUX, E. J., HEWITT, D. and COHEN, P. 2006. Eukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 361, 1023–1038.
  • KNOLL, A. H., WALTER, M. R., NARBONNE, G. M. and CHRISTIE-BLICK, N. 2006. The Ediacaran Period: a new addition to the geological time scale. Lethaia, 39, 13–30.
    Direct Link:
  • KOEHL, M. A. R. 1996. When does morphology matter? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 501–542.
  • KUMAR, S. 1995. Megafossils from the Mesoproterozoic Rohtas Formation (the Vindhyan Supergroup), Katni area, central India. Precambrian Research, 72, 171–184.
  • KUMAR, S. 2001. Mesoproterozoic megafossil Chuaria-Tawuia association may represent parts of a multicellular plant, Vindyan Supergroup, central India. Precambrian Research, 106, 187–211.
  • KURLAND, C. G., COLLINS, L. J. and PENNY, D. 2006. Genomics and the irreducible nature of eukaryote cells. Science, 312, 1011–1014.
  • LEHMAN, C. L. and TILMAN, D. 2000. Biodiversity, stability, and productivity in competitive communities. American Naturalist, 156, 534–552.
  • LEROI, A. M. 2000. The scale independence of evolution. Evolution and Development, 2, 66–77.
  • LIEBERMAN, B. S. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of some basal Early Cambrian trilobites, the biogeographic origins of the Eutrilobita, and the timing of the Cambrian Radiation. Journal of Paleontology, 76, 692–708.
  • LINEWEAVER, C. H. and DAVIS, T. M. 2002. Does the rapid appearance of life on earth suggest that life is common in the universe? Astrobiology, 2, 293–304.
  • LOGAN, G. A., HAYES, J., M. HIESHIMA, G. B. and SUMMONS, R. E. 1995. Terminal Proterozoic reorganization of biogeochemical cycles. Nature, 376, 53–56.
  • LYNCH, M. and CONERY, J. S. 2003. The origins of genome complexity. Science, 302, 1401–1404.
  • MARSHALL, C. R. 2006. Explaining the Cambrian ‘explosion’ of animals. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 34, 355–384.
  • MARTÍN, H. G. and GOLDENFELD, N. 2006. On the origin and robustness of power-law species-area relationships in ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 10,310–10,315.
  • MARTIN, M. W. GRAZHDANKIN, D. V. BOWRING, S. A. EVANS, D. A. D. FEDONKIN, M. A. and KIRSCHVINK, J. L. 2000. Age of Neoproterozoic bilatarian body and trace fossils, White Sea, Russia: implications for metazoan evolution. Science, 288, 841–845.
  • MAURER, B. A. 2003. Adaptive diversification of body size: the roles of physical constraint, energetics and natural selection. 174–191. In BLACKBURN, T. M. and GASTON, K. J. (eds). Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 442 pp.
  • MAY, R. M. 1973. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 235 pp.
  • MAY, R. M. 1994. Biological diversity: differences between land and sea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 343, 105–111.
  • MCCANN, K. 2000. The diversity-stability debate. Nature, 405, 228–233.
  • McILROY, D. and LOGAN, G. A. 1999. The impact of bioturbation on infaunal ecology and evolution during the Proterozoic-Cambrian transition. Palaios, 14, 58–72.
  • McSHEA, D. W. 1996. Metazoan complexity and evolution: is there a trend? Evolution, 50, 477–492.
  • MENGE, B. A. 1995. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: patterns and importance. Ecological Monographs, 65, 21–74.
  • MOREIRA, D. and LÓPEZ-GARCÍA, P. 2002. The molecular ecology of microbial eukaryotes unveils a hidden world. Trends in Microbiology, 10, 31–38.
  • NAEEM, S. and LI, S. 1998. Consumer species richness and autotrophic biomass. Ecology, 79, 2603–2615.
  • NAGANUMA, T. 1996. Calanoid copepods: linking lower-higher trophic levels by linking lower-higher Reynolds numbers. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 136, 311–313.
  • NARBONNE, G. 2005. The Ediacara biota: Neoproterozoic origin of animals and their ecosystems. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 33, 421–442.
  • NORRIS, R. D. 2000. Pelagic species diversity, biogeography, and evolution. In Paleobiology, 26 (Supplement to No. 4, ERWIN, D. H. and WING, S. L. eds, Deep time, Paleobiology's perspective), 236–258.
  • ODUM, E. P. 1969. The strategy of ecological development. Science, 164, 262–270.
  • PARSONS, P. A. 1993. Developmental variability and the limits of adaptation: interactions with stress. Genetica, 89, 245–253.
  • PAYNE, J. L. and FINNEGAN, S. 2006. Controls on marine animal biomass through geological time. Geobiology, 4, 1–10.
    Direct Link:
  • PETERS, S. E. 2005. Geologic constraints on the macroevolutionary history of marine animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 12,326–12,331.
  • PETERSON, K. J. and BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 2005. Origin of the Eumetazoa: testing ecological predictions of molecular clocks against the Proterozoic fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 9547–9552.
  • PHILIPPE, H., LOPEZ, H., BRINKMANN, H., BUDIN, K., GERMOT, A., LAURENT, J., MOREIRA, D., MÜLLER, M. and GUYADER, H. 2000. Early branching or fast-evolving eukaryotes? An answer based on slowly evolving positions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 267, 1213–1221.
  • POOLE, A. M., PHILLIPS, M. J. and PENNY, D. 2003. Prokaryote and eukaryote evolvability. Biosystems, 69, 163–185.
  • PORTER, S. M., MEISTERFELD, R. and KNOLL, A. H. 2003. Vase-shaped microfossils from the Neoproterozoic Chuar Group, Grand Canyon: a classification guided by modern testate amoebae. Journal of Paleontology, 77, 409–429.
  • RASMUSSEN, B., BENGTSON, S., FLETCHER, I. R. and McNAUGHTON, N. J. 2002. Discoidal impressions and trace-like fossils more than 1200 million years old. Science, 296, 1112–1115.
  • ROOPNARINE, P. D. 2006. Extinction cascades and catastrophe in ancient food webs. Paleobiology, 32, 1–19.
  • ROSENZWEIG, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 436 pp.
  • ROSENZWEIG, M. L. 2001. The four questions: what does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 3, 361–367.
  • ROSSELLÓ-MORA, R. and AMANN, R. 2001. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 25, 39–67.
  • RUNNEGAR, B. 1982. The Cambrian explosion – animals or fossils? Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 29, 395–411.
  • SCHOPF, J. W. 1994. Disparate rates, differing fates – tempo and mode of evolution changed from the Precambrian to the Phanerozoic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 6735–6742.
  • SCHOPF, J. W. 2006. Fossil evidence of Archaean life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 361, 869–885.
  • SCHWINGHAMER, P. 1983. Generating ecological hypotheses from biomass spectra using causal analysis: a benthic example. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 13, 151–166.
  • SEILACHER, A., BOSE, P. K. and PFLÜGER. F. 1998. Triploblastic animals more than 1 billion years ago: trace fossil evidence from India. Science, 282, 80–83.
  • SEPKOSKI, J. J. Jr 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology, 10, 246–267.
  • SEUSS, D. 1954. Horton hears a who. Random House, New York, NY, 72 pp.
  • SHELDON, R. W., PRAKASH, A. and SUTCLIFFE, W. H. 1972. The size distribution of particles in the ocean. Limnology and Oceanography, 17, 327–340.
  • SINHA, S. and SINHA, S. 2005. Evidence of universality for the May – Wigner stability theorem for random networks with local dynamics. Physical Review E, 71, doi 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.020902.
  • SMITH, V. H., FOSTER, B. L., GROVER, J. P., HOLT, R. D., LEIBOLD, M. A. and De NOYELLES, F. Jr 2005. Phytoplankton species richness scales consistently from laboratory microcosms to the world's oceans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 4393–4396.
  • SOGIN, M. L., MORRISON, H. G., HUBER, J. A., WELCH, D. M., HUSE, S. M., NEAL, P. R., ARRIETA, J. M. and HERNDL, G. J. 2006. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 12,115–12,120.
  • SOLÉ, R. V., MONTOYA, J. M. and ERWIN, D. H. 2002. Recovery after mass extinction: evolutionary assembly in large-scale biosphere dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 357, 697–707.
  • SUMMONS, R. E., JAHNKE, L. L., HOPE, J. M. and LOGAN, G. A. 1999. 2-methylhopanoids as biomarkers for cyanobacterial oxygenic photosynthesis. Nature, 400, 554–557.
  • THINGSTAD, T. F. 1998. A theoretical approach to structuring mechanisms in the pelagic food web. Hydrobiologia, 363, 59–72.
  • TILMAN, D., REICH, P. B. and KNOPS, J. M. H. 2006. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade long grassland experiment. Nature, 441, 629–632.
  • TOMITANI, A., KNOLL, A. H., CAVANAUGH, C. M. and OHNO, T. 2006. The evolutionary diversification of cyanobacteria: molecular-phylogenetic and paleontological perspectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 5442–5447.
  • VERITY, P. G. and SMETACEK, V. 1996. Organism life cycles, predation, and the structure of marine pelagic ecosystems. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 130, 277–293.
  • VERMEIJ, G. J. 1989. The origin of skeletons. Palaios, 4, 585–589.
  • VERMEIJ, G. J. 1994. The evolutionary interaction among species: selection, escalation, and coevolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25, 219–236.
  • VIDAL, G. and KNOLL, A. H. 1982. Radiations and extinctions of plankton in the late Proterozoic and early Cambrian. Nature, 297, 57–60.
  • VIDAL, G. and MOCZYDLOWSKA-VIDAL, M. 1997. Biodiversity, speciation, and extinction trends of Proterozoic and Cambrian phytoplankton. Paleobiology, 23, 230–246.
  • WALTER, M. R., DU, R. and HORODYSKI, R. J. 1990. Coiled carbonaceous megafossils from the Middle Proterozoic of Jixian (Tianjin) and Montana. American Journal of Science, 290-A, 133–148.
  • WASSMANN, P. 1998. Retention versus export food chains: processes controlling sinking loss from marine pelagic systems. Hydrobiologia, 363, 29–57.
  • WHITMAN, W. B., COLEMAN, D. C. and WIEBE, W. J. 1998. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 6578–6583.
  • WILLIS, J. C. 1926. Age and area. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1, 553–571.
  • WOODCOCK, S., CURTIS, T. P., HEAD, I. M., LUNN, M. and SLOAN, W. T. 2006. Taxa-area relationships for microbes: the unsampled and the unseen. Ecology Letters, 9, 805–812.
    Direct Link:
  • WORM, B. and DUFFY, J. E. 2003. Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 628–632.
  • XIAO, S. 2002. Mitotic topologies and mechanics of Neoproterozoic algae and animal embryos. Paleobiology, 28, 244–250.
  • XIAO, S., YUAN, X., STEINER, M. and KNOLL, A. H. 2002. Macroscopic carbonaceous compressions in a terminal Proterozoic shale: a systematic reassessment of the Miaohe biota, south China. Journal of Paleontology, 76, 347–376.
  • ZANG, W. and WALTER, M. R. 1992. Late Proterozoic and Early Cambrian microssils and biostratigraphy, Amadeus Basin, central Australia. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir, 12, 132 pp.
  • ZHANG, Y., YIN, L., XIAO, S. and KNOLL, A. H. 1998. Permineralized fossils from the terminal Proterozoic Doushantuo Formation, South China. Paleontological Society Memoir, 50, 1–52[Journal of Paleontology Supplement 72 (4)].
  • ZHURAVLEV, A. Yu 2001. Biotic diversity and structure during the Neoproterozoic–Ordovician transition. 173–199. In ZHURAVLEV, A. Yu and RIDING, R. (eds). Ecology of the Cambrian radiation. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 525 pp.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (181K)