Corpses, dead body politics and agency in human geography: following the corpse of Dr Petru Groza
Article first published online: 10 APR 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00502.x
© 2012 The Authors. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers © 2012 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)
Issue

Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Volume 38, Issue 1, pages 135–148, January 2013
Additional Information
How to Cite
Young, C. and Light, D. (2013), Corpses, dead body politics and agency in human geography: following the corpse of Dr Petru Groza. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38: 135–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00502.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 6 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 10 APR 2012
- Revised manuscript received 23 December 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- corpses;
- dead body politics;
- mobility agency;
- death studies;
- deathscapes;
- Romania
This paper follows the mobilities between 1958 and 1990 of the dead body of Dr Petru Groza (1884–1958), a significant political figure in post-World War II socialist Romania, to explore the implications for human geography of engaging with the dead. Although there has been a considerable interest in ‘geographies of the body’ and ‘deathscapes’, human geography has had relatively little to say about dead bodies. The paper draws on literatures from death studies and dead body politics, as well as research in memory studies, history, anthropology and law, to develop an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the role of the corpse in society, and argues that human geography should do more to consider how dead bodies contribute to the formation of contemporary geographies. To illustrate these points the analysis first explores how the treatment of Groza’s corpse and the ‘deathwork’ associated with it is an example of ‘dead body politics’. Second, the analysis draws out the agency of the corpse and its role in a variety of ‘deathscapes’. The conclusion considers the implications for human geography of engaging with ‘corpse geographies’ more generally.

1475-5661/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=500ba5ebb3aec58374cf183391c5a7be84ce887b)
1475-5661/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=c1d1c336ea7a53cbfe5fb2e01e0e0d7b88627028)