SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abedi, A. (2002). Challenges to established parties: The effects of party system features on the electoral fortunes of anti-political-establishment parties. European Journal of Political Research 41(4): 551583.
  • Bale, T. (2003). Cinderelly and her ugly sisters: The mainstream and extreme right in Europe's bipolarising party systems. West European Politics 26(3): 6790.
  • Beisheim, M. et al. (1999). Im Zeitalter der Globalisierung? Thesen und Daten zur gesellschaftlichen und politischen Denationalisierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
  • Betz, H.-G. (1993). The new politics of resentment: Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe. Comparative Politics 25(4): 413427.
  • Borg, I. & Groenen, P. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer.
  • Budge, I. (2001). Theory and measurement of party policy positions. In I.Budge et al. (eds), Mapping policy preferences: Estimates for parties, electors and governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Budge, I. & Farlie, D. (1983). Party competition: Selective emphasis or direct confrontation? An alternative view with data. In H.Daalder & P.Mair (eds), Western European party systems: Continuity and change. London: Sage.
  • Budge, I., Robertson, D. & Hearl, D. (1987). Ideology, strategy and party change: Spatial analyses of postwar election programs in 19 democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cole, A. (2005). Old right or new right? The ideological positioning of parties of the far right. European Journal of Political Research 44(2): 203230.
  • Cox, T.F. & Cox, M.A.A. (2001). Multidimensional scaling (2nd edn). London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Dalton, R.J., Flanagan, S.C. & Beck, P.A. (eds) (1984). Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies: Realignment or dealignment? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Decker, F. (2004). Der neue Rechtspopulismus. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
  • Diez Medrano, J. (2004). Framing Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Dolezal, M. (2005). Globalisierung und die Transformation des Parteienwettbewerbs in Österreich. Eine Analyse der Angebotsseite. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 34(2): 163176.
  • Evans, G. (ed.) (1999). The end of class politics? Class voting in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Franklin, M.N. (1992). The decline of cleavage politics. In M.N.Franklin, T.T.Mackie & H.Valen (eds), Electoral change: Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in Western countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Franklin, M.N., Mackie, T.T. & Valen, H. (eds) (1992). Electoral change: Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in Western countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gabel, M. & Hix, S. (2002). Defining the EU political space: An empirical study of the European elections manifestos, 1979–1999. Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 934964.
  • Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Grande, E. & Pauly, L.W. (eds) (2005). Complex sovereignty: Reconstituting political authority in the 21st century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Greven, M. T. & Pauly, L.W. (eds) (2000). Democracy beyond the state? The European dilemma and the emerging global order. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Grunberg, G. & Schweisguth, E. (1997). Vers une tripartition de l'espace politique. In D.Boy & N.Mayer (eds), L'électeur a ses raisons. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.
  • Grunberg, G. & Schweisguth, E. (2003). La tripartition de l'espace politique. In P.Perrineau & C.Ysmal (eds), Le vote de tous les refus. Les élections présidentielles et législatives de 2002. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.
  • Held, D. et al. (1999). Global transformations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Hix, S. (1999). Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses. European Journal of Political Research 35(1): 69106.
  • Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Wilson, C.J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 965989.
  • Ignazi, P. (2003). Extreme right parties in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political style among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • Kitschelt, H. (2001). Politische Konfliktlinien in westlichen Demokratien: Ethnisch-kulturelle und wirtschaftliche Verteilungskonflikte. In D.Loch & W.Heitmeyer (eds), Schattenseiten der Globalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Kitschelt, H. & McGann, A.J. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Kleinnijenhuis, J. & Pennings, P. (2001). Measurement of party positions on the basis of party programmes, media coverage and voter perceptions. In M.Laver (ed.), Estimating the policy position of political actors. London: Routledge.
  • Kleinnijenhuis, J., Ridder, J.A. de & Rietberg, E.M. (1997). Reasoning in economic discourse: An application of the network approach to the Dutch press. In C.W.Roberts (ed.), Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R.I. & Budge, I. (1994). Parties, policies and democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Kohli, M. (2000). The battlegrounds of European identity. European Societies 2(2): 113137.
  • Kriesi, H. (1993). Political mobilization and social change: The Dutch case in comparative perspective. Aldershot: Avebury.
  • Kriesi, H. (1998). The transformation of cleavage politics: The 1997 Stein Rokkan lecture. European Journal of Political Research 33(2): 165185.
  • Kriesi, H. (1999). Movements of the left, movements of the right: Putting the mobilization of two new types of social movements into political context. In H.Kitschelt et al. (eds), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kruskal, J. & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lachat, R. (2004). A Heterogenous Electorate: Individual-level Differences in the Process of Formation of Voting Choices in Germany and Switzerland. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zurich.
  • Laver, M. (1989). Party competition and party system change: The interaction of coalition bargaining and electoral competition. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1(3): 301324.
  • Mair, P. (1983). Adaptation and control: Towards an understanding of party and party system change. In H.Daalder & P.Mair (eds), Western European party systems: Continuity and change. London: Sage.
  • Mair, P. (1993). Myths of electoral change and the survival of traditional parties: The 1992 Stein Rokkan lecture. European Journal of Political Research 24(2): 121133.
  • Manza, J. & Brooks, C. (1999). Social cleavages and political change: Voter alignments and US party politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Marks, G. & Steenbergen, M. (2002). Understanding political contestation in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 879892.
  • Marks, G. & Wilson, C.J. (2000). The past in the present: A cleavage theory of party response to European integration. British Journal of Political Science 30: 433459.
  • Martin, P. (2000). Comprendre les évolutions électorales: La théorie des réalignements revisitée. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
  • Mayer, N. (2002). Ces Français qui votent Le Pen. Paris: Flammarion.
  • Müller, W.C. & Fallend, F. (2004). Changing patterns of party competition in Austria: From multipolar to bipolar system. West European Politics 27(5): 801835.
  • Müller-Rommel, F. (1984). Zum Verhältnis von neuen sozialen Bewegungen und neuen Konfliktdimensionen in den politischen Systemen Westeuropas: Eine empirische Analyse. Journal für Sozialforschung 24(4): 441454.
  • Oesch, D. (2006). Redrawing the class map: Stratification and institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Pappi, F.U. (1984). The West German party system. West European Politics 7(1): 726.
  • Pellikaan, H., Van der Meer, T. & Lange, S. de (2003). The road from a depoliticized to a centrifugal democracy. Acta Politica 38(1): 2349.
  • Pennings, P. & Keman, H. (2003). The Dutch parliamentary elections in 2002 and 2003: The rise and decline of the Fortuyn movement. Acta Politica 38(1): 5168.
  • Perrineau, P. (1997). Le symptôme Le Pen. Radiographie des électeurs du Front National. Paris: Fayard.
  • Rokkan, S. (2000). Staat, Nation und Demokratie in Europa: Die Theorie Stein Rokkans aus seinen gesammelten Werken rekonstruiert und eingeleitet von Peter Flora. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Ruggie, J.G. (1993). Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization 47(1): 139174.
  • Schattschneider, E.E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Smith, G. (1988). Between left and right: The ambivalence of European liberalism. In E.J.Kirchner (ed.), Liberal parties in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swyngedouw, M. (1995). Les nouveaux clivages dans la politique belgo-flamande. Revue française de science politique 45(5): 775790.
  • Taggart, P. (1998). A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary Western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research 33(3): 363388.
  • Van der Brug, W. (1999). Voters' perceptions and party dynamics. Party Politics 5(2): 147169.
  • Van der Brug, W. (2001). Analysing party dynamics by taking partially overlapping snapshots. In M.Laver (ed.), Estimating the policy positions of political actors. London: Routledge.
  • Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M. & Tillie, J. (2005). Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed: A two-step model of aggregate electoral support. Comparative Political Studies 38(5): 537573.
  • Van der Eijk, C. & Franklin, M.N. (eds) (1996). Choosing Europe? Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Van der Eijk, C. & Franklin, M.N. (2004). Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In G.Marks & M.R.Steenbergen (eds), European integration and political conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Warwick, P.V. (2002). Toward a common dimensionality in West European policy spaces. Party Politics 8(1): 101122.
  • Zürn, M. (1998). Schwarz-Rot-Grün-Braun: Reaktionsweisen auf Denationalisierung. In U.Beck (ed.), Politik der Globalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Zürn, M. (2001). Politische Fragmentierung als Folge der gesellschaftlichen Denationalisierung? In D.Loch & W.Heitmeyer (eds), Schattenseiten der Globalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Zürn, M. et al. (2000). Postnationale Politik? Über den politischen Umgang mit den Denationalisierungsherausforderungen Internet, Klimawandel und Migration. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 7(2): 297329.