SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aardal, B. (1995). Ideologi på tvers? In A.T.Jenssen & H.Valen (eds), Brussels midt imot. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
  • Aardal, B. & Valen, H. (1997). The Storting elections of 1989 and 1993: Norwegian politics in perspective. In K.Strøm & L.Svåsand (eds), Challenge to political parties: The case of Norway. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Alvarez, R.M. & Brehm, J. (2002). Hard choices, easy answers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bartels, L.M. (1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 194230.
  • Bowler, S. & Donovan, T. (1998). Demanding choices: Opinion, voting and direct democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Brady, H.E. & Sniderman, P.M. (1985). Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review 79: 10611078.
  • Campbell, A. et al. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
  • Christin, T., Hug, S. & Sciarini, P. (2002). Interests and information in referendum voting: An analysis of Swiss voters. European Journal of Political Research 41: 759776.
  • Converse, P.E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D.Apter (ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.
  • Converse, P.E. (2000). Assessing the capacity of mass electorates. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 331353.
  • Davis, O.A., Hinich, M.J. & Ordeshook, P. (1970). An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. American Political Science Review 64: 426448.
  • Delli Carpini, M. & Keeter, S. (1991). Stability and change in the United States public's knowledge of politics. Public Opinion Quarterly 55: 583612.
  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Druckman, J.N. (2001a). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior 23(3): 225256.
  • Druckman, J.N. (2001b). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics 63(4): 10411066.
  • Druckman, J.N. (2001c). Using credible advice to overcome framing effects. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 17(1): 6282.
  • Enelow, J. & Hinich, M.J. (1981). A new approach to voter uncertainty in the Downsian spatial model. American Journal of Political Science 25(3): 483493.
  • European Commission (2005a). The European Constitution: Post-referendum in Spain. Report on the Flash Eurobarometer Survey 168. Available online at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/flash_arch_en.htm.
  • European Commission (2005b). The European Constitution: Post-referendum in the Netherlands. Report on the Flash Eurobarometer Survey 172. Available online at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/flash_arch_en.htm.
  • Franklin, M. (2002). Learning from the Danish case: A comment on Palle Svensson's critique of the Franklin thesis. European Journal of Political Research 41: 751757.
  • Franklin, M., Van der Eijk, C. & Marsh, M. (1995). Referendum outcomes and trust in government: Public support for Europe in the wake of Maastricht. West European Politics 18(3): 101117.
  • Franklin, M., Marsh, M. & Wlezien, C. (1994). Attitudes toward Europe and referendum votes: A response to Siune and Svensson. Electoral Studies 13(2): 117121.
  • Garry, J., Marsh, M. & Sinnott, R. (2005). ‘Second order’ versus ‘issue voting’ effects in EU referendums: Evidence from the Irish Nice Treaty referendums. European Union Politics 6(2): 201221.
  • Hix, S. (1999). Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses. European Journal of Political Research 35(1): 69106.
  • Hobolt, S.B. (2005). When Europe matters: The impact of political information on voting behaviour in EU referendums. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 15(1): 85109.
  • Hobolt, S.B. (2006). Direct democracy and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 13(1): 153166.
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Wilson, C.J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 965989.
  • Hug, S. (2002). Voices of Europe: Citizens, referendums and European integration. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Iyengar, S. & Kinder, D.R. (1987) News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Key, V.O., Jr. (1966). The responsible electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • King, G. et al. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review 95(1): 4968.
  • Kriesi, H. (2005). Direct democratic choice: The Swiss experience. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Kuklinski, J.H. & Quirk, P.J. (2000). Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics and mass opinion. In A.Lupia, M.D.McCubbins & S.L.Popkin (eds), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice and the bounds of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kuklinski, J.H. & Quirk, P.J. (2001). Conceptual foundations of citizenship competence. Political Behavior 23(3): 285311.
  • Kuklinski, J.H. et al. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. Journal of Politics 62(3): 790816.
  • Lau, R.R. & Redlawsk, D.P. (1997). Voting correctly. American Political Science Review 91(3): 585598.
  • Lau, R.R. & Redlawsk, D.P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951971.
  • Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M.R. & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review 89(2): 309326.
  • Lupia, A. (n.d.). Questioning our competence: Tasks, institutions and the limited practical relevance of common political knowledge measures. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Lupia, A. (1992). Busy voters, agenda control and the power of information. American Political Science Review 86: 390403.
  • Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopaedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review 88(1): 6376.
  • Lupia, A. & Johnston, R. (2001). Are voters to blame? Voter competence and elite maneuvers in referendums. In M.Mendelsohn & A.Parkin (eds), Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites and deliberation. New York: Palgrave.
  • Lupia, A. & McCubbins, M.D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.D. & Popkin, S.L. (2000). Beyond rationality: Reason and the study of politics. In Elements of reason: Cognition, choice and the bounds of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Luskin, R.C. (1987). Measuring political sophistication. American Journal of Political Science 31: 856899.
  • Marks, G. & Steenbergen, M. (1999). Party dataset. Available online at: http://www.unc.edu/~gwmarks/data.htm
  • Marsh, M. (1998). Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science 28: 591607.
  • McKelvey, R. & Ordeshook, P.C. (1986). Information, electoral equilibria and the democratic ideal. Journal of Politics 48(4): 909937.
  • Midtbø, T. & Hines, K. (1998). The referendum-election nexus: An aggregate analysis of Norwegian voting behaviour. Electoral Studies 17(1): 7794.
  • Norris, P. (1997). Second-order elections revisited. European Journal of Political Research 31: 109124.
  • Popkin, S.L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Qvortrup, M. (2002). A comparative study of referendums: Government by the people. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Rabinowitz, G. & Macdonald, S.E. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review 83(1): 93121.
  • Ray, L. (1999). Measuring party positions on European integration: Results from an expert survey. European Journal of Political Research 36: 283306.
  • Ray, L. & Narud, H.M. (2000). Mapping the Norwegian political space: Results from an expert survey. Party Politics 6(2): 225239.
  • Reif, K. & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research 8: 344.
  • Saglie, J. (2000). Values, perceptions and European integration: The case of the Norwegian 1994 referendum. European Union Politics 1(2): 227249.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.
  • Sniderman, P.M. (2000). Taking sides: A fixed choice theory of political reasoning. In A.Lupia, M.D.McCubbins & S.L.Popkin (eds), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice and the bounds of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sniderman, P.M., Brody, R.A. & Tetlock, P. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van der Eijk, C. & Franklin, M.N. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.