Address correspondence to William L. Cull, Ph.D., Division of Health Policy Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Blvd. Elk Grove Village, IL 60007. Karen G. O'Connor, Sanford Sharp, and Suk-fong S. Tang, Ph.D., are with the American Academy of Pediatrics, Division of Health Policy Research.
Response Rates and Response Bias for 50 Surveys of Pediatricians
Version of Record online: 21 JAN 2005
Health Services Research
Volume 40, Issue 1, pages 213–226, February 2005
How to Cite
Cull, W. L., O'Connor, K. G., Sharp, S. and Tang, S.-f. S. (2005), Response Rates and Response Bias for 50 Surveys of Pediatricians. Health Services Research, 40: 213–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00350.x
- Issue online: 21 JAN 2005
- Version of Record online: 21 JAN 2005
- Response rate;
- response bias;
- physician survey
Research Objective. To track response rates across time for surveys of pediatricians, to explore whether response bias is present for these surveys, and to examine whether response bias increases with lower response rates.
Data Source/Study Setting. A total of 63,473 cases were gathered from 50 different surveys of pediatricians conducted by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) since 1994. Thirty-one surveys targeted active U.S. members of the AAP, six targeted pediatric residents, and the remaining 13 targeted AAP-member and nonmember pediatric subspecialists. Information for the full target samples, including nonrespondents, was collected using administrative databases of the AAP and the American Board of Pediatrics.
Study Design. To assess bias for each survey, age, gender, location, and AAP membership type were compared for respondents and the full target sample. Correlational analyses were conducted to examine whether surveys with lower response rates had increasing levels of response bias.
Principal Findings. Response rates to the 50 surveys examined declined significantly across survey years (1994–2002). Response rates ranged from 52 to 81 percent with an average of 68 percent. Comparisons between respondents and the full target samples showed the respondent group to be younger, to have more females, and to have less specialty-fellow members. Response bias was not apparent for pediatricians' geographical location. The average response bias, however, was fairly small for all factors: age (0.45 years younger), gender (1.4 percentage points more females), and membership type (1.1 percentage points fewer specialty-fellow members). Gender response bias was found to be inversely associated with survey response rates (r=−0.38). Even for the surveys with the lowest response rates, amount of response bias never exceeded 5 percentage points for gender, 3 years for age, or 3 percent for membership type.
Conclusions. While response biases favoring women, young physicians, and nonspecialty-fellow members were found across the 52–81 percent response rates examined in this study, the amount of bias was minimal for these factors that could be tested. At least for surveys of pediatricians, more attention should be devoted by investigators to assessments of response bias rather than relying on response rates as a proxy of response bias.