SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Caleb T. Carr, Spotlight on ethics: institutional review boards as systemic bullies, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2015, 37, 1, 14

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Jane Elkington, Mark Stevenson, Narelle Haworth, Lisa Sharwood, Using police crash databases for injury prevention research – a comparison of opt-out and opt-in approaches to study recruitment, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2014, 38, 3
  3. 3
    Patricia Kingori, Experiencing everyday ethics in context: Frontline data collectors perspectives and practices of bioethics, Social Science & Medicine, 2013, 98, 361

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Robert L. Klitzman, How IRBs View and Make Decisions About Consent Forms, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 2013, 8, 1, 8

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Robert L. Klitzman, How IRBs View and Make Decisions About Social Risks, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 2013, 8, 3, 58

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Eric J. MacLaughlin, Gail Ardery, Eric A. Jackson, Timothy J. Ives, Rodney B. Young, David S. Fike, Barry L. Carter, Institutional Review Board Barriers and Solutions Encountered in the Collaboration Among Pharmacists and Physicians to Improve Outcomes Now Study: A National Multicenter Practice-Based Implementation Trial, Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2013, 33, 9
  7. 7
    M. Dyck, G. Allen, Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?, Journal of Medical Ethics, 2013, 39, 8, 517

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Sarah North, Jean Giddens, Lessons Learned in Multisite, Nursing Education Research While Studying a Technology Learning Innovation, Journal of Nursing Education, 2013, 52, 10, 567

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Darpan I. Patel, Kathleen R. Stevens, Frank Puga, Variations in Institutional Review Board Approval in the Implementation of an Improvement Research Study, Nursing Research and Practice, 2013, 2013, 1

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Robert Klitzman, Views of IRBs Concerning Their Local Ecologies: Perceptions of Relationships, Systems, and Tensions Between IRBs and Their Institutions, AJOB Primary Research, 2013, 4, 2, 31

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Guide to the De-Identification of Personal Health Information, 2013,

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Chien-Lung Hsu, Kevin C. Tseng, Yu-Hao Chuang, A secure IRB system for assisting the development of intelligent medical devices, Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39, 16, 12512

    CrossRef

  13. You have free access to this content13
    Erin Rooney Riggs, Laird Jackson, David T. Miller, Steven Van Vooren, Phenotypic information in genomic variant databases enhances clinical care and research: The international standards for cytogenomic arrays consortium experience, Human Mutation, 2012, 33, 5
  14. 14
    GEORGE SILBERMAN, KATHERINE L. KAHN, Burdens on Research Imposed by Institutional Review Boards: The State of the Evidence and Its Implications for Regulatory Reform, Milbank Quarterly, 2011, 89, 4
  15. 15
    Ivor A. Pritchard, How Do IRB Members Make Decisions? A Review and Research Agenda, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 2011, 6, 2, 31

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Human Subjects Research Protections: Enhancing Protections for Research Subjects and Reducing Burden, Delay, and Ambiguity for Investigators, Biotechnology Law Report, 2011, 30, 6, 707

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Ellen Funkhouser, Deborah A Levine, Joe K Gerald, Thomas K Houston, Nancy K Johnson, Jeroan J Allison, Catarina I Kiefe, Recruitment activities for a nationwide, population-based, group-randomized trial: the VA MI-Plus study, Implementation Science, 2011, 6, 1, 105

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Jerry Menikoff, Reforming the Regulations Governing Research with Human Subjects, New England Journal of Medicine, 2011, 365, 12, 1145

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Robert Klitzman, The Myth of Community Differences as the Cause of Variations Among IRBs, AJOB Primary Research, 2011, 2, 2, 24

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Mark S. Schreiner, Barbara C. Engel, We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us, AJOB Primary Research, 2011, 2, 2, 39

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Timothy Stablein, Steven H. Jacobs, The Well-Being, Peer Cultures and Rights of Children, 2011,

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Ronald W. Gimbel, Louis Pangaro, Galen Barbour, Americaʼs “Undiscovered” Laboratory for Health Services Research, Medical Care, 2010, 48, 8, 751

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Alyssa LaForme Fiss, Sarah Westcott McCoy, Doreen J. Bartlett, Lisa Ann Chiarello, Robert J. Palisano, Barbara Stoskopf, Lynn Jeffries, Allison Yocum, Audrey Wood, Sharing of Lessons Learned From Multisite Research, Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2010, 22, 4, 408

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    A R Stark, J E Tyson, P L Hibberd, Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial, Journal of Perinatology, 2010, 30, 3, 163

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Brian T. Helfand, Anne K. Mongiu, Claus G. Roehrborn, Robert F. Donnell, Reginald Bruskewitz, Steven A. Kaplan, John W. Kusek, Laura Coombs, Kevin T. McVary, Variation in Institutional Review Board Responses to a Standard Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Surgical Trial, The Journal of Urology, 2009, 181, 6, 2674

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Mary A. Ott, It Takes Two to Tango: Ethical Issues Raised by the Study of Topical Microbicides with Adolescent Dyads, Journal of Adolescent Health, 2008, 42, 6, 541

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Scott Burris, Regulatory innovation in the governance of human subjects research: A cautionary tale and some modest proposals, Regulation & Governance, 2008, 2, 1
  28. 28
    Michael Silverstein, Mary Banks, Susan Fish, Howard Bauchner, Variability in Institutional Approaches to Ethics Review of Community-Based Research Conducted in Collaboration with Unaffiliated Organizations, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2008, 3, 2, 69

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Liselotte N. Dyrbye, Matthew R. Thomas, Alex J. Mechaber, Anne Eacker, William Harper, F Stanford Massie, David V. Power, Tait D. Shanafelt, Medical Education Research and IRB Review: An Analysis and Comparison of the IRB Review Process at Six Institutions, Academic Medicine, 2007, 82, 7, 654

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Jan Blustein, Marsha Regenstein, Bruce Siegel, John Billings, Notes from the Field: Jumpstarting the IRB Approval Process in Multicenter Studies, Health Services Research, 2007, 42, 4
  31. 31
    Jonathan Mansbach, Uchechi Acholonu, Sunday Clark, Carlos A. Camargo, Variation in Institutional Review Board Responses to a Standard, Observational, Pediatric Research Protocol, Academic Emergency Medicine, 2007, 14, 4
  32. 32
    Jonathan Mansbach, Uchechi Acholonu, Sunday Clark, Carlos A. Camargo, Variation in Institutional Review Board Responses to a Standard, Observational, Pediatric Research Protocol, Academic Emergency Medicine, 2007, 14, 4, 377

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Tricia Psota, Sheila West, Penny Kris-Etherton, Deborah Maddox Bagshaw, Colin Kay, Handbook of Nutrition and Food, Second Edition, 2007,

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Joel Frader, Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer, 2007,

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Sarah M. Greene, Ann M. Geiger, A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006, 59, 8, 784

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Benjamin Littenberg, Charles D. MacLean, Passive Consent for Clinical Research in the Age of HIPAA, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006, 21, 3
  37. 37
    Scott Burris, Kathryn Moss, U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 2006, 1, 2, 39

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Catherine C. Vick, Kelly R. Finan, Catarina Kiefe, Leigh Neumayer, Mary T. Hawn, Variation in Institutional Review processes for a multisite observational study, The American Journal of Surgery, 2005, 190, 5, 805

    CrossRef