Address correspondence to Junling Wang, Ph.D., M.S., Assistant Professor, Division of Health Science Administration, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, 847 Monroe Ave., Room 205R, Memphis, TN 38163. Ilene H. Zuckerman, PharmD, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Faida T. Shaya, Ph.D., M.P.H., Associate Professor and Associate Director, and C. Daniel Mullins, Ph.D., Professor and Chair are with Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD. Nancy A. Miller, Ph.D., M.A., Associate Professor is with the Department of Public Policy, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD. Jason M. Noel, PharmD, Assistant Professor is with the Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD.
Utilizing New Prescription Drugs: Disparities among Non-Hispanic Whites, Non-Hispanic Blacks, and Hispanic Whites
Article first published online: 24 JAN 2007
Health Services Research
Volume 42, Issue 4, pages 1499–1519, August 2007
How to Cite
Wang, J., Zuckerman, I. H., Miller, N. A., Shaya, F. T., Noel, J. M. and Mullins, C. D. (2007), Utilizing New Prescription Drugs: Disparities among Non-Hispanic Whites, Non-Hispanic Blacks, and Hispanic Whites. Health Services Research, 42: 1499–1519. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00682.x
- Issue published online: 24 JAN 2007
- Article first published online: 24 JAN 2007
- new prescription drugs
Objective. To examine racial and ethnic disparities in new prescription drug use.
Data Sources/Study Setting. Secondary data analyses of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (1996–2001), a national survey representative of U.S. noninstitutionalized civilian population. Drug approval dates were from the GenRx database of Mosby.
Study Design. A negative binomial model was used to compare annual number of times when new drugs were obtained across racial and ethnic groups. Covariates in the model were demographic, economic characteristics, and health status. Drugs were considered new if approved within the past 5 years. We compared non-Hispanic whites with non-Hispanic blacks, and non-Hispanic whites with Hispanic whites, respectively, to examine racial and ethnic disparities separately.
Principal Findings. Descriptive analyses found smaller racial disparities than ethnic disparities: the average annual number of times when new drugs were obtained was higher among non-Hispanic whites than non-Hispanic blacks (1.71 versus 1.36; p<.01) and Hispanic whites (1.71 versus 1.11; p<.01). Multivariate analyses found smaller ethnic than racial disparities: the number was 22–33 percent lower among non-Hispanic blacks than non-Hispanic whites (significant), and 5–16 percent lower among Hispanic whites than non-Hispanic whites (not always significant), respectively. While the absolute racial disparities decreased over the early years of the life cycles of the products, the reduction in disparities over time was not significant.
Conclusions. There are racial disparities in the use of new medications, which persist during the first 5 years of marketing. Socioeconomic and health characteristics account for a larger share of ethnic disparities than racial disparities.