Get access

Accuracy of Physician Billing Claims for Identifying Acute Respiratory Infections in Primary Care

Authors

  • Geneviève Cadieux,

    1. Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, 1140 Pine Avenue West, Montreal QC H3A 1A3, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Address correspondence to Geneviève Cadieux, M.Sc., M.D.–Ph.D. Candidate, Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, 1140 Pine Avenue West, Montreal QC H3A 1A3, Canada; e-mail: genevieve.cadieux@mail.mcgill.ca. Robyn Tamblyn, Ph.D., Professor, is with the Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

  • Robyn Tamblyn

    1. Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Objective. To assess the accuracy of physician billing claims for identifying acute respiratory infections in primary care.

Study Setting. Nine primary care physician practices in Montreal, Canada (2002–2005).

Study Design. A validation study was carried out to compare diagnoses in 3,526 physician billing claims with diagnoses documented in the corresponding patient medical records.

Data Collection. In-office medical record abstraction.

Principal Findings. Claims had a high positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and specificity for identifying respiratory infections; however, their sensitivity was below 50 percent. Large variation in sensitivity and PPV was observed among physicians.

Conclusions. Because claims data are now routinely used to monitor antibiotic prescribing in primary care, future research should determine if acute respiratory infection diagnoses are missing from claims at random, or if bias is present.

Ancillary