Bridging the Gap Between Research and Health Policy – Insights From Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars
Physician Practices and Readiness for Medical Home Reforms: Policy, Pitfalls, and Possibilities
Version of Record online: 18 OCT 2011
© Health Research and Educational Trust
Health Services Research
Volume 47, Issue 1pt2, February 2012
How to Cite
Hollingsworth, J. M., Saint, S., Sakshaug, J. W., Hayward, R. A., Zhang, L. and Miller, D. C. (2012), Physician Practices and Readiness for Medical Home Reforms: Policy, Pitfalls, and Possibilities. Health Services Research, 47: n/a. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01332.x
- Issue online: 12 JAN 2012
- Version of Record online: 18 OCT 2011
- patient-centered care;
- organization and administration;
- primary health care
To determine the proportion of physician practices in the United States that currently meets medical home criteria.
Data Source/Study Setting.
2007 and 2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.
We mapped survey items to the National Committee on Quality Assurance's (NCQA's) medical home standards. After awarding points for each “passed” element, we calculated a practice's infrastructure score, dividing its cumulative total by the number of available points. We identified practices that would be recognized as a medical home (Level 1 [25–49 percent], Level 2 [50–74 percent], or Level 3 [infrastructure score ≥75 percent]) and examined characteristics associated with NCQA recognition.
Forty-six percent (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 42.5–50.2) of all practices lack sufficient medical home infrastructure. While 72.3 percent (95 percent CI, 64.0–80.7 percent) of multi-specialty groups would achieve recognition, only 49.8 percent (95 percent CI, 45.2–54.5 percent) of solo/partnership practices meet NCQA standards. Although better prepared than specialists, 40 percent of primary care practices would not qualify as a medical home under present criteria.
Almost half of all practices fail to meet NCQA standards for medical home recognition.