Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Record Systems and Process Quality of Care: Evidence from a Panel Data Analysis of U.S. Acute-Care Hospitals
Article first published online: 20 JUL 2012
© Health Research and Educational Trust
Health Services Research
Volume 48, Issue 2pt1, pages 354–375, April 2013
How to Cite
Appari, A., Eric Johnson, M. and Anthony, D. L. (2013), Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Record Systems and Process Quality of Care: Evidence from a Panel Data Analysis of U.S. Acute-Care Hospitals. Health Services Research, 48: 354–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01448.x
- Issue published online: 8 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 20 JUL 2012
- National Science Foundation. Grant Number: NSF-CNS-0910842
- Electronic health record;
- EHR meaningful use;
- acute-care hospitals;
- inpatient process quality;
- panel data analysis
To estimate the incremental effects of transitions in electronic health record (EHR) system capabilities on hospital process quality.
Hospital Compare (process quality), Health Information and Management Systems Society Analytics (EHR use), and Inpatient Prospective Payment System (hospital characteristics) for 2006–2010.
Hospital EHR systems were categorized into five levels (Level_0 to Level_4) based on use of eight clinical applications. Level_3 systems can meet 2011 EHR “meaningful use” objectives. Process quality was measured as composite scores on a 100-point scale for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and surgical care infection prevention. Statistical analyses were conducted using fixed effects linear panel regression model for all hospitals, hospitals stratified on condition-specific baseline quality, and for large hospitals.
Among all hospitals, implementing Level_3 systems yielded an incremental 0.35–0.49 percentage point increase in quality (over Level_2) across three conditions. Hospitals in bottom quartile of baseline quality increased 1.16–1.61 percentage points across three conditions for reaching Level_3. However, transitioning to Level_4 yielded an incremental decrease of 0.90–1.0 points for three conditions among all hospitals and 0.65–1.78 for bottom quartile hospitals.
Hospitals transitioning to EHR systems capable of meeting 2011 meaningful use objectives improved process quality, and lower quality hospitals experienced even higher gains. However, hospitals that transitioned to more advanced systems saw quality declines.