We thank David Aboody, Phil Berger (editor), John Core, Wayne Guay, Bob Holthausen, Mo Khan, S. P. Kothari, Shyam Sunder, Ro Verrecchia, Ross Watts, Joe Weber, an anonymous referee, and seminar participants at the University of Pennsylvania and Singapore Management University for their helpful comments. We appreciate financial support from the Accounting Research Center at the Kellogg School of Management (Northwestern University), the Sloan School of Management (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), and the Wharton School (University of Pennsylvania). We are also grateful for financial support from the Deloitte & Touche Foundation.
Implications of Transaction Costs for the Post–Earnings Announcement Drift
Version of Record online: 28 MAR 2008
©University of Chicago on behalf of the Institute of Professional Accounting, 2008
Journal of Accounting Research
Volume 46, Issue 3, pages 661–696, June 2008
How to Cite
NG, J., RUSTICUS, T. O. and VERDI, R. S. (2008), Implications of Transaction Costs for the Post–Earnings Announcement Drift. Journal of Accounting Research, 46: 661–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00290.x
- Issue online: 28 MAR 2008
- Version of Record online: 28 MAR 2008
- Received 9 September 2006; accepted 12 October 2007
This paper examines the effect of transaction costs on the post–earnings announcement drift (PEAD). Using standard market microstructure features we show that transaction costs constrain the informed trades that are necessary to incorporate earnings information into price. This implies weaker return responses at the time of the earnings announcement and higher subsequent returns drift for firms with higher transaction costs. Consistent with this prediction, we find that earnings response coefficients are lower for firms with higher transaction costs. Using portfolio analyses, we find that the profits of implementing the PEAD trading strategy are significantly reduced by transaction costs. In addition, we show, using a combination of portfolio and regression analyses, that firms with higher transaction costs are the ones that provide the higher abnormal returns for the PEAD strategy. Our results indicate that transaction costs can provide an explanation not only for the persistence but also for the existence of PEAD.