SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Alchian, A. A., and H. Demsetz. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. American Economic Review 62 (1972): 77795.
  • Alexander, C. R., and M. A. Cohen. New Evidence on the Origins of Corporate Crime. Managerial and Decision Economics 17 (1996): 42135.
  • American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Arlington , VA : APA, 2000. Web site, http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/pathgambledis.htm.
  • Arthaud-Day, M.; S. T. Certo; C. M. Dalton; and D. R. Dalton. A Changing of the Guard: Executive and Director Turnover Following Corporate Financial Restatements. Academy of Management Journal 49 (2006): 111936.
  • Baber, W. R.; K. R. Kumar; and T. Verghese. Client Security Price Reactions to the Laventhol and Horwath Bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research 33 (1995): 38595.
  • Bailis, D. S., and R. J. MacCoun. Estimating Liability Risks with the Media as Your Guide: A Content Analysis of Media Coverage of Tort Litigation. Law and Human Behavior 20 (1996): 41929.
  • Ball, R. Making Accounting More International: Why, How, and How Far Will It Go Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 8 (1995): 1929.
  • Ball, R. Infrastructure Requirements for an Economically Efficient System of Public Financial Reporting and Disclosure. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services (2001): 12769.
  • Ball, R. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors. Accounting and Business Research International Accounting Policy Forum (2006): 527.
  • Ball, R.; S. P. Kothari; and A. Robin. The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics 29 (2000): 151.
  • Ball, R.; A. Robin; and J. Wu. Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in Four Asian Countries,” Journal of Accounting & Economics 36 (2003): 23570.
  • Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. Earnings Quality in U.K. Private Firms: Comparative Loss Recognition Timeliness. Journal of Accounting & Economics 39 (2005): 83128.
  • Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. How Much New Information Is There in Earnings Journal of Accounting Research 46 (2008): 9751016.
  • Barton, J. Who Cares About Auditor Reputation Contemporary Accounting Research 22 (2005): 54986.
  • Bartov, E. The Timing of Asset Sales and Earnings Manipulation. The Accounting Review 68 (1993): 84055.
  • Beatty, R. P. Auditor Reputation and the Pricing of Initial Public Offerings. The Accounting Review 64 (1989): 693709.
  • Benston, G. The Value of the SEC's Accounting Disclosure Requirements. The Accounting Review 54 (1969): 51532.
  • Benston, G. Required Disclosure and the Stock Market: An Evaluation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The American Economic Review 63 (1973): 13255.
  • Beresford, D. R. The FASB's Accomplishments to Date: One Participant's Views. Accounting Historians Journal 25 (1998): 15166.
  • Beresford, D. R. Congress Looks at Accounting for Business Combinations. Accounting Horizons 15 (2001): 7386.
  • Besen, S. M., and J. Farrell. Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1994): 11731.
  • British Broadcasting Commission (BBC). “Enron's Boss Due to Be Sentenced. BBC News. Web site, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6075072.stm.
  • Brudney, V., and A. Ferrell. Corporate Charitable Giving. The University of Chicago Law Review 69 (2002): 119697.
  • Buchanan, J., and G. Tullock. The Calculus of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor , MI : University of Michigan Press, 1962.
  • Burgstahler, D.; L. Hail; and C. Leuz. The Importance of Reporting Incentives: Earnings Management in European Private and Public Firms. The Accounting Review 81 (2006): 9831016.
  • Burns, N., and Kedia, S. The Impact of Performance-Based Compensation on Misreporting. Journal of Financial Economics 79 (2006): 3567.
  • Carey, J. L. The Rise of the Accounting Profession, Volume One: From Technician to Professional, 1896–1936. New York , NY : American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 1969.
  • Causey, D. Y., Jr . Newly Emerging Standards of Auditor Responsibility. The Accounting Review 51 (1976): 1930.
  • Chaney, P. K., and K. L. Philipich. Shredded Reputation: The Cost of Audit Failure. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (2002): 122145.
  • Chapman, T. G.; T. A. Zitek; and S. P. Yellin. Criminal Liability of Public Accountants: A Lurking Nightmare The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 67 (1976): 3245.
  • Chow, C.; L. Kramer; and W. Wallace. The Environment of Auditing,” in Research Opportunities in Auditing: The Second Decade, edited by A. R.Abdel-Khalik and I.Solomon. Sarasota , FL : American Accounting Association, 1988: 15583.
  • Coates, J. C. Private vs. Political Choice of Securities Regulation: A Political Cost/Benefit Analysis. Virginia Journal of International Law 41 (2001): 53182.
  • Coates, J. C. The Goals and Promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (2007): 91116.
  • Coffee, J. C., Jr . Market Failure and the Economic Case for a Mandatory Disclosure System. Virginia Law Review 70 (1984): 71753.
  • Coffee, J. C., Jr . Understanding Enron: ‘It's About the Gatekeepers, Stupid.’ Business Lawyer 57 (2002): 140320.
  • Coffee, J. C., Jr . A Theory of Corporate Scandals: Why The USA and Europe Differ. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 21 (2005): 198211.
  • Coffee, J. C., Jr . Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance. Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • Coffee, J. C., Jr . Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement.” Working paper, Columbia Law and Economics, 2007. Working Paper No. 304. Web site, http://ssrn.com/abstract=967482.
  • Committee on Capital Markets Regulation. Interim Report. November 30, 2006. Web site, http://www.capmktsreg.org/research.html.
  • Craswell, A.; J. Francis; and S. Taylor. Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specialization. Journal of Accounting & Economics 20 (1995): 297322.
  • Davidson, Robert. Does the Economy's Performance Impact a Management's Decision to Commit Fraud?” Working paper, University of Chicago , 2008.
  • Davis, L., and Simon, D. The Impact of SEC Disciplinary Actions on Audit Fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 11 (1992): 5868.
  • DeAngelo, L. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting & Economics 3 (1981): 18399.
  • DeFond, M. L.; K. Raghunandan; and K. R. Subramanyam. Do Non–Audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (2002): 124774.
  • Desai, H.; Hogan, C. E.; and Wilkins, M. S. The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management Turnover. The Accounting Review 81 (2006): 83112.
  • Dyck, I. J. A.; A. Morse; and L. Zingales. Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?” Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research , 2007. NBER Working Paper No. W12882 (February).
  • Dye, R. A. Auditing Standards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth,” The Journal of Political Economy 101 (1993): 887914.
  • Efendi, J.; A. Srivastava; and E. Swanson. Why Do Corporate Managers Misstate Financial Statements? The Role of In-The-Money Options and Other Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 85 (2007): 66770.
  • Eisenberg, T., and J. R. Macey. Was Arthur Andersen Different? An Empirical Examination of Major Accounting Firm Audits of Large Clients. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (2004): 263300.
  • Engel, E.; R. M. Hayes; and X. Wang. The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and Firms' Going-Private Decisions. Journal of Accounting & Economics 44 (2007): 11645.
  • Erickson, M.; M. Hanlon; and E. L. Maydew. Is There a Link Between Executive Equity Incentives and Accounting Fraud Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2006): 11343.
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information.” Statement of Financial Accounting Concept No. 2, SFAC 2 . Norwalk , Connecticut : Financial Accounting Standards Board , 1980.
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts. Norwalk , Connecticut : Financial Accounting Standards Board , 1987.
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Proposal for a Principles-Based Approach to U.S. Standard Setting. Norwalk , CT : FASB, 2002.
  • Firth, M. Auditor Reputation: The Impact of Critical Reports Issued by Government Inspectors. RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1990): 37487.
  • Francis, J. R. The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices: A Study of the Australian Market. Journal of Accounting & Economics 6 (1984): 13351.
  • Francis, J. R., and D. Simon. A Test of Audit Pricing in the Small-Client Segment of the U.S. Audit Market. The Accounting Review 62 (1987): 14557.
  • Frankel, R. M.; M. F. Johnson; and K. K. Nelson. The Relation Between Auditors' Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Quality. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement 2002): 71105.
  • Franz, D. R.; D. Crawford; and E. N. Johnson. The Impact of Litigation Against an Audit Firm on the Market Value of Nonlitigating Clients. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 13 (1998): 11734.
  • Galbraith, J. K. The Great Crash, 1929. London , UK : Penguin Books, 1961.
  • Geiger, M. A.; C. S. Lennox; and D. S. North. The Hiring of Accounting and Finance Officers from Audit Firms: How Did the Market React Review of Accounting Studies 13 (2008): 5586.
  • Glater, J. D. Enron's Many Strands: Accounting; Ernst & Young Latest Auditor Moving to Alter Some Practices. The New York Times (February 5, 2002).
  • Greenspan, A. Federal Reserve Board's Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.” Testimony before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate, July 16, 2002.
  • Gullapalli, D. Living with Sarbanes-Oxley: How Companies Are Coping in the New Era of Corporate Governance. Wall Street Journal (October 17, 2005, R1).
  • Harris, J. D., and P. Bromiley. Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation. Organization Science 18 (2006): 35067.
  • Hayek, F. A. The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review 35 (1945): 51930.
  • Hayek, F. A. The Fatal Conceit. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press, 1988.
  • Herrick, T., and A. Barrionuevo. Were Auditor and Client Too Close-Knit Wall Street Journal (January 21, 2002): C1.
  • Isbell, D. B. Continental Vending Case: Lessons for the Profession. Journal of Accountancy 130 (1970): 3340.
  • Jackson, H. E. Variation in the Intensity of Financial Regulation: Preliminary Evidence and Potential Implications. Yale Journal on Regulation 24 (2007): 10139.
  • Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. Theory of the Firm: Management Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976): 30560.
  • Karpoff, J. M., and J. R. Lott, Jr . The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear from Committing Criminal Fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 36 (1993): 757–802.
  • Kedia, S., and T. Philippon. The Economics of Fraudulent Accounting. Review of Financial Studies (2009): Forthcoming.
  • Kellogg, R. L. Accounting Activities, Security Prices, and Class Action Lawsuits. Journal of Accounting & Economics 6 (1984): 185204.
  • Khurana, I., and K. Raman. Litigation Risk and the Financial Reporting Credibility of Big 4 vs. Non-Big 4 Audits: Evidence from Anglo American Countries. The Accounting Review 79 (2004): 47395.
  • Kinney, W. R., Jr .; Z.- V. Palmrose; and S. Scholz. Auditor Independence, Non-Audit Services, and Restatements: Was the U.S. Government Right Journal of Accounting Research 42 (2004): 56188.
  • Kinzer, S. Enron's Fall Reverberates in Houston's Arts World. New York Times (December 18, 2001): Available at http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9803EFDC173EF93BA25751C1A9679C8B63.
  • Kothari, S. P.; T. Lys; C. W. Smith; and R. L. Watts. Auditor Liability and Information Disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing Finance 3 (1988): 30740.
  • Kreps, D., and R. Wilson. Reputation and Imperfect Information. Journal of Economic Theory 27 (1982): 25379.
  • Larcker, D. F., and S. A. Richardson. Fees Paid to Audit Firms, Accrual Choices, and Corporate Governance. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (2004): 62558.
  • Leuz, C. Was the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 Really This Costly? A Discussion of Evidence from Event Returns and Going-Private Decisions. Journal of Accounting & Economics 44 (2007): 14665.
  • Leuz, C.; D. Nanda; and P. Wysocki. Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69 (2003): 50528.
  • Leuz, C., and C. Schrand. Disclosure and the Cost of Capital: Evidence from Firms' Responses to the Enron Shock.” Working paper, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business , 2008.
  • Loebbecke, J. K.; M. M. Eining; and J. J. Willingham. Auditors' Experience with Material Irregularities: Frequency, Nature, and Detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 9 (1989): 128.
  • Lys, T., and R. Watts. Lawsuits Against Auditors Under the Security Acts. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Supplement 1994): 6593.
  • Mahoney, P. G. The Development of Securities Law in the United States. Journal of Accounting Research 47 (Supplement 2009): this issue.
  • Maremont, M., and L. P. Cohen. Tyco's Internal Report Finds Extensive Accounting Tricks. Wall Street Journal Online (December 31, 2002). Web site, http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB1041284714352956633,00.html.
  • Menon, K., and D. Williams. The Insurance Hypothesis and Market Reaction. The Accounting Review 69 (1994): 327–42.
  • Michaels, A. Grant Thornton Hit by Client Losses after Parmalat Scandal. Financial Times (March 18, 2004).
  • Milgrom, P. R.; D. C. North; and B. R. Weingast. The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs. Economics & Politics 2 (1990): 123.
  • Moonitz, M. Three Contributions to the Development of Accounting Principles Prior to 1930.” Journal of Accounting Research 8 (1970): 14555.
  • Moreland, K. A. Criticisms of Auditors and the Association Between Earnings and Returns of Client Firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 14 (1995): 94104.
  • Myatt, J. Covering the Enron Story: Playing Softball and Playing Catch-Up.” University of Houston , April 17, 2004. Web site, http://soc.hfac.uh.edu/artman/publish/article_90.shtml.
  • Nelson, K. K.; R. A. Price; and B. R. Rountree. The Market Reaction to Arthur Andersen's Shredding of Documents: Loss of Reputation or Confounding Effects?” Working paper, Rice University , 2008.
  • Nelson, R., and S. G. Winter. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press, 1982.
  • Norris, F. Enron's Collapse: News Analysis; for Andersen and Enron, the Questions Just Keep Coming. The New York Times (January 16, 2002).
  • North, D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York , NY : Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • The Oyez Project. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005). Web site, http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_04_368/.
  • Painter, R. W. Commentary on Brudney and Ferrell. The University of Chicago Law Review 69 (2002): 121929.
  • Palmrose, Z.-V. Audit Fees and Auditor Size. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (1986): 97110.
  • Palmrose, Z.-V. Litigation and Independent Auditors: The Role of Business Failures and Management Fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 6 (1987): 90103.
  • Palmrose, Z.-V. An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality. The Accounting Review 63 (1988): 5573.
  • Palmrose, Z.-V.; V. J. Richardson; and S. Scholz. Determinants of Market Reactions to Restatement Announcements. Journal of Accounting & Economics 37 (2004): 5989.
  • Park, J. J. The Competing Paradigms of Securities Regulation. Duke Law Journal 57 (2007): 62589.
  • Peltzman, S. Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19 (1976): 21140.
  • Posner, R. Theories of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics 5 (1974): 33558.
  • Romano, R. The Advantage of Competitive Federalism for Securities Regulation. AEI Studies on Financial Market Deregulation. Washington , DC : American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 2002.
  • Romano, R. The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance. Yale Law Journal 114 (2005): 1521611.
  • Sadka, G. The Economic Consequences of Accounting Fraud in Product Markets: Theory and a Case from the U.S. Telecommunications Industry (WorldCom). American Law and Economics Review 8 (2006): 43975.
  • Schipper, K. Principles-Based Accounting Standards. Accounting Horizons 17 (2003): 6172.
  • Schrand, C. M., and S. L. C. Zechman. Executive Overconfidence and the Slippery Slope to Fraud.” Working paper, University of Pennsylvania and University of Chicago, 2008.
  • Seligman, J. The Transformation of Wall Street: A History of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Modern Corporate Finance. Boston , MA : Houghton Mifflin, 1982.
  • Shortridge, R., and M. Myring. Defining Principles-Based Accounting Standards. The CAP Journal Online. New York Society of CPAs, 2004. Web site, http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2004/804/essentials/p34.htm.
  • Simmons, L. E., and E. M. Ryan. Securities Class Action Settlements: 2007 Review and Analysis.” San Francisco , CA : Cornerstone Research, 2008. Web site, http://securities.stanford.edu.
  • Simunic, D. A. The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1980): 16190.
  • Sinason, D., and C. Pacini. An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Fraud in Client Firm Market Reaction to Auditor Lawsuits. Journal of Forensic Accounting 1 (2000): 21540.
  • Spacek, L. 1970 “The Need for an Accounting Court. The Accounting Review 33 (1958): 36879.
  • Spence, M. Job Market Signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (1973): 35574.
  • Srinivasan, S. Consequences of Financial Reporting Failure for Outside Directors: Evidence from Accounting Restatements and Audit Committee Members. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (2005): 291334.
  • Stamp, E. Establishing Accounting Principles. Abacus 6 (1970): 96104.
  • Sterling, R. R. Accounting Power. Journal of Accountancy (1973): 6167.
  • Stigler, G. J. Public Regulation of the Securities Markets. Journal of Business 37 (1964): 11742.
  • Stigler, G. J. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1971): 321.
  • Storey, R. K. The Search for Accounting Principles. New York : AICPA, 1964.
  • Strobl, G. Earnings Manipulation and the Cost of Capital.” Working paper, University of North Carolina, Kenan-Flagler Business School , 2008.
  • Telser, L. G. A Theory of Self-Enforcing Agreements. Journal of Business 53 (1980): 2744.
  • U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. Second Interim Report of Neal Bateson, Court-Appointed Examiner. Case No. 01-16034 (ALJ), January 21, 2003.
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “Hitachi Foundation Board Dinner Welcoming Remarks, Thomas J. Donohue President & CEO, July 14, 2003.” Web site, http://www.uschamber.com/press/speeches/2003/030714tjd_hitachi.htm.
  • U.S. Government, Department of Justice. Fact Sheet: President's Corporate Fraud Task Force Marks Five Years of Ensuring Corporate Integrity. Washington , DC : U.S. Government, July 17, 2007. Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2007/July/07_odag_507.html.
  • U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Education and the Workforce. The Enron Collapse and its Implications for Worker Retirement Security Part II. 107th Cong., 2d sess., 7 February 2002.
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release Nos. 1405–1410. (June 19, 2001). Web site http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/friactions/act2q01.shtml.
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Office of the Chief Accountant. Web site, http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/oca.htm.
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). “Testimony Concerning the Roles of the SEC and the FASB in Establishing GAAP, by Robert K. Herdman, before the House Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises, Committee on Financial Services, May 14, 2002.” Web site, http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/051402tsrkh.htm.
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Chief Accountant. Study Pursuant to Section 108(d) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on the Adoption by the United States Financial Reporting System of a Principles-Based Accounting System. Web site, http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/principlesbasedstand.htm, 2003.
  • Walker, R. G. The SEC's Ban on Upward Asset Revaluations and the Disclosure of Current Values. Abacus 28 (1992): 335.
  • Wallace, W. The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated Markets: A Review. Research in Accounting Regulation 1 (1987): 734.
  • Watts, R. L. Corporate Financial Statements: A Product of the Market and Political Processes. Australian Journal of Management 2 (1977): 5275.
  • Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (1983): 61333.
  • Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice-Hall, 1986.
  • Waymire, G. B., and S. Basu. Accounting Is an Evolved Economic Institution.” Working paper, Emory Law and Economics , 2008. Research Paper No. 08-33.
  • Weber, J.; M. Willenborg; and J. Zhang. Does Auditor Reputation Matter? The Case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (2008): 941–72.
  • Wikipedia Contributors. Arthur Andersen. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, Web site, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arthur_Andersen&oldid=268704664 (accessed September 17, 2008).
  • Wilson, E. O. Sociobiology: A New Synthesis. Harvard , MA : Harvard University Press, 1975.
  • Wilson, J. Q. The Moral Sense. New York , NY : The Free Press, 1993.
  • Wilson, T. E., and Grimlund, R. A. An Examination of the Importance of an Auditor's Reputation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 9 (1990): 4359.
  • Yardley, J. Enron's Collapse: The Hometown; Fall of Enron Ends Its Dance with Houston. New York Times (January 14, 2002).
  • Zeff, S. A. Forging Accounting Principles in Five Countries: A History and an Analysis of Trends. Champaign , IL : Stipes Publishing Co., 1972.
  • Zeff, S. A. Some Junctures in the Evolution of the Process of Establishing Accounting Principles in the U.S.A.: 1917–1972. The Accounting Review 59 (1984): 44768.
  • Zeff, S. A. How the U.S. Accounting Profession Got Where It Is Today: Part I. Accounting Horizons 17 (2003a): 189205.
  • Zeff, S. A. How the U.S. Accounting Profession Got Where It Is Today: Part II. Accounting Horizons 17 (2003b): 26786.
  • Zeff, S. A. The Primacy of ‘Present Fairly’ in the Auditor's Report. The Emanuel Saxe Distinguished Lecture in Accounting, Baruch College of the City University of New York, April 10, 2006. Web site, http://newman.baruch.cuny.edu/digital/saxe/saxe_2006/zeff_06.htm
  • Zeff, S. A. The SEC Rules Historical Cost Accounting: 1934 to the 1970s.” Working paper, Rice University , 2007.
  • Zhang, I. X. Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Accounting & Economics 44 (2007): 74115.
  • Zingales, L. The Future of Security Regulation. Journal of Accounting Research 47 (Supplement 2009): this issue.