This work was supported by the CIBA Foundation and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The author thanks K. Weimer for assistance with data collection, K. Eva for assistance with data entry, and M. Wilson, S. Gangestad, M. Daly, P. Shaver, and K. Widaman for discussion of the ideas and helpful comments on an earlier version of this article. The author is also grateful to J. Simpson and three anonymous reviewers whose comments also helped improve the article.
Context-specific mate choice criteria: Women's trade-offs in the contexts of long-term and extra-pair mateships
Article first published online: 20 MAY 2005
Volume 8, Issue 4, pages 371–389, December 2001
How to Cite
SCHEIB, J. E. (2001), Context-specific mate choice criteria: Women's trade-offs in the contexts of long-term and extra-pair mateships. Personal Relationships, 8: 371–389. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00046.x
- Issue published online: 20 MAY 2005
- Article first published online: 20 MAY 2005
Women's mate choice criteria were examined experimentally in the contexts of long-term and extra-pair mateship scenarios. In long-term mateships, women may benefit by pairing with males who provide material resources and assistance in child rearing. In contrast, in extra-pair mateships, women may benefit in other ways, with such benefits outweighing the potential costs imposed by a primary mate who discovers the relationship. One benefit, or evolutionary function, of extra-pair mateships may be to replace a primary mate, in which case mate preferences should look similar across long-term and extra-pair contexts. However, another function of extra-pair mateships may be to obtain high quality gametes (Le., “good genes”), in which case women should be differentially attracted to cues of heritable phenotypic quality, such as physical attractiveness. By using detailed verbal and pictorial descriptions of men and requiring participants to trade off physical attractiveness for good character (i.e., being a good cooperator and parent), it was possible to determine whether women's criteria for partners varied across experimental contexts. Findings suggest that extra-pair mateships may have served the evolutionary function of obtaining “good genes,” because attractiveness was more important in extra-pair mateships to the detriment of good character. This effect was maintained even when characteristics of the female participants (age, parity, marital experience) were covaried. In addition, the preference for physical attractiveness was specific to the sexual context; it did not generalize, in a second experiment, to choices among short-term male coworkers.