SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431441.
  • Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R., & Bator, R. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363377.
  • Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
  • Byrne, D., Ervin, C. E., & Lamberth, J. (1970). Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 157165.
  • Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2007). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people really know what they desire in a romantic partner? Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (in press). Speed-dating: A powerful and flexible paradigm for studying relationship initiation. In S.Sprecher, A.Wenzel, & J.Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship beginnings. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2007). Selective versus unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is created equal. Psychological Science, 18, 317319.
    Direct Link:
  • Fisman, R., Iyengar, S. S., Kamenica, E., & Simonson, I. (2006). Searching for a mate: Evidence from a speed-dating experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 673697.
  • Iyengar, S. S., Simonson, I., Fisman, R., & Mogilner, C. (2005, January). I know what I want but can I find it?: Examining the dynamic relationship between stated and revealed preferences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP), New Orleans, LA.
  • Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
  • Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 142182). Orlando, FL: Academic.
  • Kline, K., Kline, D., & Hunt, B. (2004). SQL in a nutshell (2nd ed.), Sebastopol, CA, O’Reilly Media.
  • Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227244.
  • MacFarquhar, N. (2006, September 19). It’s Muslim boy meets girl, but don’t call it dating. New York Times, p. A1.
  • Metts, S., Sprecher, S., & Cupach, W. R. (1991). Retrospective self-reports. In B. M.Montgomery & S.Duck (Eds.) Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 162178). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). The relationship closeness induction task. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 14.
  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of perceived communication for romantic and friendship attraction experienced during a get-acquainted date. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 391400.
  • Stanczyk, S., Champion, B., & Leyton, R. (2001). Theory and practice of relational databases (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 3960.
  • Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508516.