Comparative Theory and Political Practice: Do We Need a ‘State-Nation’ Model as Well as a ‘Nation-State’ Model?†
Article first published online: 14 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00241.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Stepan, A. (2008), Comparative Theory and Political Practice: Do We Need a ‘State-Nation’ Model as Well as a ‘Nation-State’ Model?. Government and Opposition, 43: 1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00241.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 14 JAN 2008
Abstract
Some polities have strong cultural diversity, some of which is territorially based and politically articulated by significant groups that, in the name of nationalism, and self-determination, advance claims for independence. In this article such polities are defined as ‘politically robustly multinational’. If the goal is peace and democracy in one state in such a polity, this article advances theoretical and empirical arguments to show that ideal typical ‘nation-state’ making policies are less appropriate than policies associated with new ideal type I construct called ‘state-nation’. Countries discussed are Spain, Belgium, and Canada and the ‘matched pair’ of successful Tamil political integration via state nation policies in India, and failed Tamil political integration due to nation-state policies in Sri Lanka.

1477-7053/asset/GOOP_left.gif?v=1&s=c9a57371b04429ddab816514aaae92f509eec790)
1477-7053/asset/GOOP_right.gif?v=1&s=0705c36e53caa0877ce99a98f6bfd906457ea371)
