I would like to thank Feroz Ahmad and Yaşar Geyikdağı for their invaluable comments and suggestions, which greatly improved this article. All remaining errors are solely the author's responsibility.
A Symptomatic Analysis of the Justice and Development Party's Populism in Turkey, 2007–2010
Version of Record online: 3 SEP 2012
© The Author 2012. Government and Opposition © 2012 Government and Opposition Ltd
Government and Opposition
Volume 47, Issue 4, pages 618–640, October 2012
How to Cite
Dinçşahin, Ş. (2012), A Symptomatic Analysis of the Justice and Development Party's Populism in Turkey, 2007–2010. Government and Opposition, 47: 618–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01377.x
- Issue online: 3 SEP 2012
- Version of Record online: 3 SEP 2012
This article focuses on the populist strategy of the Turkish Justice and Development Party between the 2007 presidential election, when Turkish politics experienced an impasse, and the 2010 referendum over the constitutional amendments. As a means of analysing populism, the symptomatic approach is preferred over other theoretical perspectives, including empiricism and historicism. An analysis of the discourse articulated by Prime Minister Erdoğan leads us to the conclusion that he has continually appealed to the masses with an anti-institutional rhetoric that divides society into ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’, thereby fulfilling the criteria of populism according to the symptomatic approach.