The vertical integration of Lisbon and sustainable development strategies across the EU: How different governance architectures shape the European coherence of policy documents

Authors

  • Reinhard Steurer,

    Corresponding author
    1. InFER — the Institute of Forest, Environmental, and Natural Resource Policy at the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
      Dr. Reinhard Steurer is an Assistant Professor at InFER — the Institute of Forest, Environmental, and Natural Resource Policy at the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria. E-mail: reinhard.steurer@boku.ac.at
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Gerald Berger,

    1. RIMAS — the Research Institute for Managing Sustainability at the Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Markus Hametner

    1. RIMAS — the Research Institute for Managing Sustainability at the Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Gerald Berger and Markus Hametner are Senior Researchers at RIMAS — the Research Institute for Managing Sustainability at the Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria.

Dr. Reinhard Steurer is an Assistant Professor at InFER — the Institute of Forest, Environmental, and Natural Resource Policy at the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria. E-mail: reinhard.steurer@boku.ac.at

Abstract

In Europe, sustainable development (SD) is pursued with not one but two overarching strategies, i.e., the so-called Lisbon and SD strategies. While the Lisbon Strategy is a genuinely European response to global economic and social pressures, SD strategies are national efforts corresponding with international (mainly United Nations) guidance to better coordinate and integrate economic, social and, in particular, environmental policies. The present paper explores the vertical coordination and coherence of the two pan-European strategies. After reviewing the international background of SD strategies and the EU origins of the Lisbon strategy, the paper characterizes and compares the governance architectures of the two strategies. With a solid background on how vertical policy integration functions in the two processes, the paper then shows how this affects the coherence of respective strategy structures and monitoring indicators. Based on an extensive empirical stocktaking study of the objectives and indicators in Lisbon and SD strategies across Europe it is shown that, despite the stronger European coordination through the Open Method of Coordination, the Lisbon process entailed only slightly more coherent national strategies than international guidance did in the context of SD strategies. Thus, the paper concludes that the influence international organizations such as the UN and the OECD have on national policy-making must not be underestimated.

Ancillary