This article corrects:

  1. A 35-year follow-up of a large cohort of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis seen at a single centre Volume 31, Issue 3, 361–368, Article first published online: 8 November 2010

In Floreani et al. (1), the last row of Table 4 should read “Non-Response to UDCA” rather than “Response to UDCA”.

Table 4.   Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors associated with mortality risk in ursodeoxycholic acid treated patients during follow-up
VariablesAdjusted OR95% CI adjusted ORP
  1. CI, confidence intervals; OR, odds ratio; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid.

Females vs males0.5640.1242.5700.460
Age at onset1.0320.9941.0720.105
Years of follow-up1.0360.9781.0980.223
Histological stage1.1150.7981.5590.524
Oesophageal varices8.8092.97926.052<0.001
Variceal bleeding1.1800.2146.4960.849
Non-Response to UDCA3.9351.6819.2100.002

The correct table should be: The authors regret this error.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02478.x