1478-9302/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=bdbdd0c7f1ceafcd23e60f1f925938a486a792b1)
1478-9302/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=8a5333f81d8e5d7ca9a5ae1beaeae3dcc0ca294a)
1478-9302/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=e86fb501fd3a301c8ef6a32dd18693e8c24d2aab)
Two Concepts of Violence
Article first published online: 22 APR 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2005.00023.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Bufacchi, V. (2005), Two Concepts of Violence. Political Studies Review, 3: 193–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2005.00023.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 22 APR 2005
- Article first published online: 22 APR 2005
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
The aim of this review article is to explore some theoretical issues regarding the nature and scope of violence. There are two ways of thinking about violence: in terms of an act of force, or in terms of a violation. Those who define violence as an intentional act of excessive or destructive force endorse a narrow conception of violence (the Minimalist Conception of Violence or MCV), while those who see violence in terms of a violation of rights champion a broader conception of violence (the Comprehensive Conception of Violence or CCV). The strengths and weaknesses of both approaches will be assessed.