Get access

Is routine cervical dilatation necessary during elective caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial

Authors

Errata

This article is corrected by:

  1. Errata: Erratum Volume 49, Issue 5, 575, Article first published online: 24 September 2009

: Dr Kemal Güngördük, Bittişikbaglar orka sok. Nur Apt 5/13. Bakıköy, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: maidenkemal@yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this prospective randomised study was to determine the effect of routine cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section on maternal morbidity.

Methods: Participants with indication for elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A (n = 200) women with intraoperative cervical dilatation; group B (n = 200) women with no intraoperative cervical dilatation.

Results: No demographic differences were observed between groups. There was no significant difference between groups in infectious morbidity (P = 0.87) (relative risk (RR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58–2.11), endometritis (P = 0.72) (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.39–7.14), febrile morbidity (P = 0.66) (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.51–2.87), wound infection (P = 0.82) (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.44–2.81), endometritis (P = 0.72) (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.39–7.14) or urinary tract infection (P = 1.00) (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.28–3.50), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.2). However, group A had longer operative times compared with the group B (P = 0.01).

Conclusion: Intraoperative digital cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section did not reduce blood loss and postoperative infectious morbidity. The routine digital cervical dilatation during elective caesarean section is not recommended.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary