The monophyletic origin of the Brachiopoda

Authors

  • ALBERT J. ROWELL

    1. Albert J. Rowell, Department of Geology and Museum of Invertebrate Paleontology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, U.S.A.; 17th September, 1981.
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Although it is commonly acepted that the brachiopods descended from phoronid-like ancestors there is dispute over their origin. Traditionally they have been regarded as a monophyletic group, a clade. More recently it has been claimed that brachiopods are polyphyletic and that several of the orders arose independently from separate phoronid-like stocks. The latter point of view implies that brachiopods are not a taxon but merely a grade of organization. Traditional stratophenetic approaches do little to resolve the problem, which may be outside their domain. It is possible, even probable, that the initial radiation involved organisms that lacked mineralized shells. Cladistic analysis of both living forms and Lower Paleozoic taxa strongly supports the contention that brachiopods are monophytetic and closely related to the phoronids. It suggests, however, that the ‘inarticulate’ Paterinida and Kutorginida are genealogically more closely related to the Articulata than they are to the remaining Inarticulata. □Brachiopoda, Lophophorata, cladistics, Cambrian.

Ancillary