Editor's Note:Conservation Biology does in fact have a manuscript category that addresses what the author suggests. The category Conservation in Practice is meant to address real-life successes and failures in conservation. We have always welcomed manuscripts that show not only successful but failed attempts at implementation of conservation science.
Failing but Learning: Writing the Wrongs after Redford and Taber
Version of Record online: 9 FEB 2006
Volume 20, Issue 4, pages 1312–1314, August 2006
How to Cite
KNIGHT, A. T. (2006), Failing but Learning: Writing the Wrongs after Redford and Taber. Conservation Biology, 20: 1312–1314. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00366.x
- Issue online: 9 FEB 2006
- Version of Record online: 9 FEB 2006
- Paper submitted April 27, 2005; revised manuscript accepted September 8, 2005.
Options for accessing this content:
- If you are a society or association member and require assistance with obtaining online access instructions please contact our Journal Customer Services team.
- Login via other institutional login options http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/login-options.
- You can purchase online access to this Article for a 24-hour period (price varies by title)
- New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.
Login via OpenAthens
Search for your institution's name below to login via Shibboleth.
Registered Users please login:
- Access your saved publications, articles and searches
- Manage your email alerts, orders and subscriptions
- Change your contact information, including your password
Please register to:
- Save publications, articles and searches
- Get email alerts
- Get all the benefits mentioned below!