Literature Cited

  • Baxter, G. S., M. Hockings, R. W. Carter, and R. J. S. Beeton. 1999. Trends in wildlife management and the appropriateness of Australian university training. Conservation Biology 13:842849.
  • Brook, A., M. Zint, and R. De Young. 2003. Landowners' responses to an endangered species act listing and implications for encouraging conservation. Conservation Biology 17:16381649.
  • Cheng, A. S., L. E. Kruger, and S. E. Daniels. 2003. “Place” as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda. Society and Natural Resources 16:87104.
  • Chornesky, E., D. Forester, E. Hamilton, and P. Szabo. 2001. People matters: The Nature Conservancy's use of social science tools to understand and work within the human context of conservation. The Nature Conservancy, Washington , D.C .
  • Community Conservation Coalition. 2003. Putting conservation in context: social science tools for conservation practitioners CD-ROM. Community Conservation Coalition, Washington , D.C .
  • Czech, B., and P. R. Krausman. 1997. Distribution and causation of species endangerment in the United States. Science 277:11161117.
  • Fazey, I., J. Fischer, and D. B. Lindenmayer. 2005. What do conservation biologists publish Biological Conservation 124:6373.
  • Forester, D. J., and G. E. Machlis. 1996. Modeling human factors that affect the loss of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 10:12531263.
  • Gober, P. 2000. In search of synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:111.
  • Hilborn, R., and M. Mangel. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton , New Jersey .
  • Holling, C. S., editor. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley and Sons, London .
  • Jakobsen, C. H., T. Hels, and W. J. McLaughlin. 2004. Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison. Forest Policy and Economics 6:1531.
  • Johnson, S. E., and B. E. Graber. 2002. Enlisting the social sciences in decisions about dam removal. Bioscience 52:731738.
  • Kainer, K. A., M. Schmink, H. Covert, J. R. Stepp, E. M. Bruna, J. L. Dain, S. Espinosa, and S. Humphries. 2006. A graduate education framework for tropical conservation and development. Conservation Biology 20:313.
  • Lidicker, W. 1998. Revisiting the human dimension in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 12:11701171.
  • Machlis, G. E. 1996. Usable knowledge: a plan for furthering social science and the national parks (summary). National Park Service, Washington , D.C .
  • Mascia, M. B., J. P. Brosius, T. A. Dobson, B. C. Forbes, L. Horowitz, M. A. McKean, and N. J. Turner. 2003. Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology 17:649650.
  • Meffe, G. K., R. F. Noss, and S. K. Jacobson. 1998. Revisiting the human dimension in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 12:11711172.
  • Metzger, N., and R. N. Zare. 1999. Interdisciplinary research: from belief to reality. Science 283:642643.
  • Noss, R. F. 1997. The failure of universities to produce conservation biologists. Conservation Biology 11:12671269.
  • Nyhus, P. J., F. R. Westley, R. C. Lacy, and P. S. Miller. 2002. A role for natural resource social science in biodiversity risk assessment. Society and Natural Resources 15:923932.
  • Rosa, E. A., and G. E. Machlis. 2002. It's a bad thing to make one thing into two: disciplinary distinctions as trained incapacities. Society and Natural Resources 15:251261.
  • Thornhill, A. 2003. Social scientists and conservation biologists join forces. Conservation Biology 17:1476.
  • Walters, C. J. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. McGraw Hill, New York .