SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Adams, R., and D. Gallo. 2001a. The economic impact on Butte County of anadromous fish restoration program actions on agricultural lands in the Butte Creek watershed. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Stockton , California .
  • Adams, R., and D. Gallo. 2001b. The impact on Glenn County property tax revenues of public land acquisitions in the Sacramento River Conservation Area. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chico, California.
  • Alario, M. 2000. Urban and ecological planning in Chicago: science, policy and dissent. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43:489504.
  • Allan, D., D. Erickson, and J. Fay. 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 37:149161.
  • Allan, J., and L. Johnson. 1997. Catchment-scale analysis of aquatic ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37:107111.
  • Alpert, P., F. Griggs, and D. Peterson. 1999. Riparian forest restoration along large rivers: initial results from the Sacramento River Project. Restoration Ecology 7:360368.
  • Armsworth, P., G. Daily, P. Kareiva, and J. Sanchirico. 2006. Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:54035408.
  • Buckley, M. 2004. Strategic restoration: game theory applied to the Sacramento River Conservation Area. Proceedings of the sixteenth international conference. Society for Ecological Restoration, Victoria , British Columbia .
  • Buckley, M., and B. Haddad. 2006. Socially strategic ecological restoration: a game-theoretic analysis. Environmental Management 38:4861.
  • Carpenter, S., and K. Cottingham. 1997. Resilience and restoration of lakes. Conservation Ecology 1:http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art2/.
  • Colding, J., J. Lundberg, and C. Folke. 2006. Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management. AMBIO 35:237244.
  • Conover, M. 1998. Perceptions of American agricultural producers about wildlife on their farms and ranches. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:597604.
  • Folke, C. 2006. The economic perspective: conservation against development versus conservation for development. Conservation Biology 20:686688.
  • Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441473.
  • Freilich, J., J. Emlen, J. Duda, D. Freeman, and P. Cafaro. 2003. Ecological effects of ranching: a six-point critique. BioScience 53:759765.
  • Goudie, A. 1986. The human impact on the natural environment. MIT Press, Cambridge , Massachusetts .
  • Grimble, R., and K. Wellard. 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 55:173193.
  • Hacking, H. 2006. Colusa on offensive against new restoration projects. Chico Enterprise-Record January 12: http://www.chicoer.com/local_news/ci_3394047.
  • Hanson, J., R. Dismukes, W. Chambers, C. Greene, and A. Kremen. 2004. Risk and risk management in organic agriculture: views of organic farmers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19:218227.
  • Harding, J., E. Benfield, P. Bolstad, G. Helfman, and E. Jones. 1998. Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95:1484314847.
  • Higgs, E. 1997. What is good ecological restoration Conservation Biology 11:338348.
  • Holl, K., and E. Crone. 2004. Applicability of landscape and island biogeography theory to restoration of riparian understorey plants. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:922933.
  • Jones, L. 2005. Colusa subreach planning project landowner survey. Institute for Social Research-California State University, Sacramento .
  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263292.
  • Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler. 1991. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias: anomalies. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5:193206.
  • Kauffman, J. 2004. Death rides the forest: perceptions of fire, land use, and ecological restoration of western forests. Conservation Biology 18:878882.
  • Knight, R., W. Walton, G. Meara, W. Reisen, and R. Wass. 2003. Strategies for effective mosquito control in constructed treatment wetlands. Ecological Engineering 21:211232.
  • Kremen, C., et al. 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land use change. Ecology Letters 10:299314.
  • Lamb, D., and D. Gilmour. 2003. Rehabilitation and restoration of degraded forest. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge , United Kingdom .
  • McGinnis, M., J. Woolley, and J. Gamman. 1999. Bioregional conflict resolution: rebuilding community in watershed planning and organizing. Environmental Management 24:112.
  • Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of economics. Macmillan, London .
  • Martin, G. 2002. Tract backtracking; farmers wary of Sacramento River habitat plan. San Francisco Chronicle April 17 : A17.
  • Marzluff, J., and K. Ewing. 2001. Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restoration Ecology 9:280292.
  • Marzluff, J., and M. Restani. 1999. The effects of forest fragmentation on avian nest predation. Pages 155169 in J.Rochelle, L.Lehmann, and J.Wisniewski, editors. Forest fragmentation: wildlife and management implications. Brill Academic Publishing, Leiden , The Netherlands .
  • Merrill, T., D. Mattson, R. Wright, and H. Quigley. 1999. Defining landscapes suitable for restoration of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Idaho. Biological Conservation 87:231248.
  • Muthoo, A. 1999. Bargain theory with applications. Cambridge University Press, New York .
  • The Nature Conservancy (TNC). 2003. Tamarisk control in southern California. TNC, Arlington , Virginia . Available from http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/success/ca003.html (accessed February 2006).
  • Pease, J., M. Rankin, J. Verdon, and R. Reisz. 1997. Why landowners restore wetlands: a national survey. Iowa State University Extension, Ames .
  • Pfadenhauer, J. 2001. Some remarks on the socio-cultural background of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 9:220229.
  • Sacramento River Advisory Council (SRAC). 1998. Sacramento River Conservation Area handbook. Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California.
  • Sanderson, E., J. Malanding, M. Levy, K. Redford, A. Wannebo, and G. Woolmer. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52:891904.
  • Schlosser, I. 1991. Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. BioScience 41:704712.
  • Schultz, L., C. Folke, and P. Olsson. 2007. Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation 34:140152.
  • Shields, F., J. C. Cooper, S. Knight, and M. Moore. 2003. Stream corridor restoration research: a long and winding road. Ecological Engineering 20:441454.
  • Snyder, N., S. Mostaghimi, D. Berry, R. Reneau, S. Hong, P. McClellan, and E. Smith. 1998. Impact of riparian forest buffers on agricultural nonpoint source pollution. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34:385395.
  • Sponseller, R., E. Benfield, and H. Valett. 2001. Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology 46:14091424.
  • Willott, E. 2004. Restoring nature, without mosquitoes Restoration Ecology 12:147153.
  • Wolf, K. 2002. Advancing wildlife restoration and compatible farming along the Sacramento River—final report. The Nature Conservancy, Chico , California .
  • Wondolleck, J., and S. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington , D.C .