Developing an Ocean Ethic: Science, Utility, Aesthetics, Self-Interest, and Different Ways of Knowing
Version of Record online: 16 SEP 2008
©2008 Society for Conservation Biology
Volume 23, Issue 1, pages 233–235, February 2009
How to Cite
AUSTER, P. J., FUJITA, R., KELLERT, S. R., AVISE, J., CAMPAGNA, C., CUKER, B., DAYTON, P., HENEMAN, B., KENCHINGTON, R., STONE, G., NOTARBARTOLO DI SCIARA, G. and GLYNN, P. (2009), Developing an Ocean Ethic: Science, Utility, Aesthetics, Self-Interest, and Different Ways of Knowing. Conservation Biology, 23: 233–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01057.x
- Issue online: 14 JAN 2009
- Version of Record online: 16 SEP 2008
- Paper submitted May 1, 2008; revised manuscript accepted June 16, 2008.
- 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–637. , et al.
- 2005. Perspectives on an ethic toward the sea. American Fisheries Society Symposium 41:703–711.
- 1993. The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington , D.C. , and .
- 2006. The gospel of green. Will evangelicals help save the earth? Onearth 28:35–37.
- 2005. Are U.S. coral reefs on the slippery slope to slime? Science 307:1725–1726. , et al.