SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Bélisle, M. 2005. Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 86:19881995.
  • Berven, K. A., and T. A. Grudzen. 1990. Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44:20472056.
  • Bried, J. T., and G. N. Ervin. 2006. Abundance patterns of dragonflies along a wetland buffer. Wetlands 26:878883.
  • Bulger, J. B., N. J. Scott Jr, and R. B. Seymour. 2003. Terrestrial activity and conservation of adult California red-legged frogs Rana aurora draytonii in coastal forests and grasslands. Biological Conservation 110:8595.
  • Burke, V. J., and J. W. Gibbons. 1995. Terrestrial buffer zones and wetland conservation: a case study of freshwater turtles in a Carolina bay. Conservation Biology 9:13651369.
  • Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York .
  • Correll, D. L. 2005. Principles of planning and establishment of buffer zones. Ecological Engineering 24:433439.
  • Crawford, J. A., and R. D. Semlitsch. 2007. Estimation of core terrestrial habitat for stream-breeding salamanders and delineation of riparian buffers for protection of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 21:152158.
  • Cushman, S. A. 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 128:231240.
  • Denoël, M. 1996. Phénologie et domaine vital de la salamandre terrestre Salamandra salamandra terrestris (Amphibia, Caudata) dans un bois du Pays de Herve (Belgique). Chaiers d'Ethologie 16:291306.
  • Denoël, M., and G. F. Ficetola. 2007. Landscape level thresholds and newt conservation. Ecological Applications 17:302309.
  • Denoël, M., and G. F. Ficetola. 2008. Conservation of newt guilds in an agricultural landscape of Belgium: the importance of aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18:714728.
  • Fahrig, L., J. H. Peldar, S. E. Pope, P. D. Taylor, and J. F. Wegner. 1995. Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biological Conservation 73:177182.
  • Ficetola, G. F., and F. De Bernardi. 2004. Amphibians in an human-dominated landscape: the community structure is related to habitat features and isolation. Biological Conservation 119:219230.
  • Ficetola, G. F., E. Padoa-Schioppa, A. Monti, R. Massa, F. De Bernardi, and L. Bottoni. 2004. The importance of aquatic and terrestrial habitat for the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis): implications for conservation planning and management. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82:17041712.
  • Ficetola, G. F., T. W. J. Garner, and F. De Bernardi. 2007a. Genetic diversity, but not hatching success, is jointly affected by post glacial colonization and isolation in the threatened frog, Rana latastei. Molecular Ecology 16:17871797.
  • Ficetola, G. F., R. Sacchi, S. Scali, A. Gentilli, F. De Bernardi, and P. Galeotti. 2007b. Vertebrates respond differently to human disturbance: implications for the use of a focal species approach. Acta Oecologica 31:109118.
  • Gibbons, J. W. 2003. Terrestrial habitat: a vital component for herpetofauna of isolated wetlands. Wetlands 23:630635.
  • Hanski, I., and O. E.Gaggiotti, editors. 2004. Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego , California .
  • Heyer, W. R., M. A.Donnelly, R. W.McDiarmid, L. C.Hayek, and M. S.Foster, editors. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington , D.C .
  • Hitchings, S. P., and T. J. C. Beebee. 1997. Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation. Heredity 79:117127.
  • Husté, A., J. Clobert, and C. Miaud. 2006. The movements and breeding site fidelity of the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) in an urban park near Paris (France) with management recommendations. Amphibia-Reptilia 27:561568.
  • Joly, J. 1968. Données écologiques sur la salamandre tachetée Salamandra salamandra. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Zoologie–Paris 12:301366.
  • Joyal, L. A., M. McCollough, and M. L. Hunter Jr. 2001. Landscape ecology approaches to wetland species conservation: a case study of two turtle species in Southern Maine. Conservation Biology 15:17551762.
  • Kiffney, P. M., J. S. Richardson, and J. P. Bull. 2003. Responses of periphyton and insects to experimental manipulations of riparian buffer width along forest streams. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:10601076.
  • Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam .
  • Lukacs, P. M., W. L. Thompson, W. L. Kendall, W. R. Gould, P. F. Doherty, K. P. Burnham, and D. R. Anderson. 2007. Concerns regarding a call for pluralism of information theory and hypothesis testing. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:456460.
  • McGarigal, K., and S. A. Cushman. 2002. Comparative study of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications 12:335345.
  • Marsh, D. M., and P. C. Trenham. 2001. Metapopulations dynamics and Amphibian conservation. Conservation Biology 15:4049.
  • Menéndez, R., and C. D. Thomas. 2006. Can occupancy patterns be used to predict distributions in widely separated geographic regions? Oecologia 149:396405.
  • Oksanen, J., R. Kindt, and R. B. O'Hara. 2005. Vegan: community ecology package. Department of Statistics and Mathematics, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration , Vienna . Available from http://www.r-project.org (accessed June 2007).
  • Olden, J. D. 2007. Critical threshold effects of benthiscape structure on stream herbivore movement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362:461472.
  • Olson, D. H., W. P.Leonard, and R. B.Bury, editors. 1997. Sampling amphibians in lentic habitats. Society for Northwestern Vertebrate Biology, Olympia , Washington .
  • Olson, D. H., P. D. Anderson, C. A. Frissel, H. H. Welsh, and D. F. Bradford. 2007. Biodiversity management approaches for stream-riparian areas: perspectives for Pacific Northwest headwater forests, microclimates, and amphibians. Forest Ecology and Management 246:81107.
  • Parris, K. M. 2006. Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:757764.
  • Pellet, J., A. Guisan, and N. Perrin. 2004. A concentric analysis of the impact of urbanization on the threatened European tree frog in an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 18:15991606.
  • Ponsero, A., and P. Joly. 1998. Clutch size, egg survival and migration distance in the agile frog (Rana dalmatina) in a floodplain. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie 12:343352.
  • Roe, J. H., and A. Georges. 2007. Heterogeneous wetland complexes, buffer zones, and travel corridors: landscape management for freshwater reptiles. Biological Conservation 135:6776.
  • Rowe, G., and T. J. C. Beebee. 2007. Defining population boundaries: use of three Bayesian approaches with microsatellite data from British natterjack toads (Bufo calamita). Molecular Ecology 16:785796.
  • Schlaepfer, M. A., and T. A. Gavin. 2001. Edge effects on lizards and frogs in tropical forest fragments. Conservation Biology 15:10791090.
  • Schroeder, E. E. 1976. Dispersal and movement of newly transformed green frogs, Rana clamitans. American Midland Naturalist 95:471474.
  • Schulte, U., D. Küsters, and S. Steinfartz. 2007. A PIT tag based analysis of annual movement patterns of adult fire salamanders (Salamandra salamandra) in a Middle European habitat. Amphibia-Reptilia 28:531536.
  • Semlitsch, R. D. 1998. Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Conservation Biology 12:11131119.
  • Semlitsch, R. D., and J. R. Bodie. 2003. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conservation Biology 17:12191228.
  • Sindaco, R., G.Doria, E.Razzetti, and F.Bernini, editors. 2006. Atlas of Italian amphibians and reptiles. Polistampa, Firenze , Italy .
  • Smith, M. A., and D. M. Green. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28:110128.
  • Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, New York .
  • Stuempel, N. 2005. Phaenologie, Aktivitaet und Wachstum von Springfroeschen (Rana dalmatina) in unterschiedlichen Sommerlebensraeumen in Suedostniedersachsen. Zeitschrift fuer Feldherpetologie 12:7199.
  • Turcotte, Y., and A. Desrochers. 2003. Landscape-dependent response to predation risk by forest birds. Oikos 100:614618.
  • Van Buskirk, J. V. 2005. Local and landscape influence on amphibian occurrence and abundance. Ecology 86:19361947.
  • Vos, C. C., and A. H. P. Stumpel. 1996. Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution pattern in the tree frog (Hyla arborea). Landscape Ecology 11:203214.
  • Whittingham, M. J., J. R. Krebs, R. D. Swetnam, J. A. Vickery, J. D. Wilson, and R. P. Freckleton. 2007. Should conservation strategies consider spatial generality? Farmland birds show regional not national patterns of habitat association. Ecology Letters 10:2535.