Literature Cited

  • Chan, K. M. A. 2008. Value and advocacy in conservation biology: crisis discipline or discipline in crisis? Conservation Biology 22:13.
  • Cuarón, A. D., and P. C. De Grammont. 2007. Shortcomings of threatened species categorization systems: reply to Soberón and Medellin. Conservation Biology 21:13681370.
  • Gill, B. R. 2001. Professionalism advocacy, and credibility: a futile cycle? Human Dimensions of Wildlife 6:2132.
  • Minnis, D. L., and R. J. Stout McPeake. 2001. An analysis of advocacy within the wildlife profession. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 6:110.
  • Porter, T. 1995. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, Princeton , New Jersey .
  • Rigg, C. M. 2001. Orchestrating ecosystem management: challenges and lessons from Sequoia National Forest. Conservation Biology 15:7890.
  • Shapin, S. 1995. Cordelia's love: credibility and the social studies of science. Perspectives on Science 3:255275.
  • Shrader-Frechette, K. 1996. Throwing out the bathwater of positivism, keeping the baby of objectivity: relativism and objectivity in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 10:912914.
  • Thomas, J. W., and D. W. Pletscher. 2002. The “Lynx Affair”: professional credibility on the line. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30:12811286.
  • Wilson, E. O. 2006. The creation: an appeal to save life on earth. W.W. Norton, New York .