Refocusing the Debate about Advocacy
Version of Record online: 19 JAN 2011
Journal compilation ©2010 Society for Conservation Biology. No claim to original US government works.
Volume 25, Issue 1, pages 1–3, February 2011
How to Cite
Scott, J. M. and Rachlow, J. L. (2011), Refocusing the Debate about Advocacy. Conservation Biology, 25: 1–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01629.x
- Issue online: 19 JAN 2011
- Version of Record online: 19 JAN 2011
- 1994. Science and the law in the wake of Daubert: a new search for scientific knowledge. Texas Law Review 72:715–802. , , and .
- 2007. Conservation and four types of advocacy. Conservation Biology 21:21–24. , and .
- 2006. Faith-based fisheries. Fisheries 31:554–555. .
- 2007. Science, scientists, and policy advocacy. Conservation Biology 21:12–17.
- 2010. Above the din but in the fray: environmental scientists as effective advocates. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8:299–305. , , , and .
- 2009. On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why and how. Conservation Biology 25:1090–1101. , and .
- 1996. Conservation biology, values and advocacy. Conservation Biology 10:904.
- 2007. The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , United Kingdom .
- 2010. Scientific independence and credibility in sociopolitical processes. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:1179–1182.
- 2008. Policy and position statements: what is an appropriate role of professional societies? BioScience 58:865–869. , , and .
- 2007. Policy, advocacy, and science: prevalence in the research literature and perspectives of conservation biologists. Conservation Biology 21:29–35. , , , , , , , , , and .
- 2009. One hundred questions of importance to global biological diversity. Conservation Biology 23:557–567. , et al .
- 1996. The importance of science in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 10:918–919. , and .
- 1996. Oil, seabirds, and science. BioScience 46:587–597.
- 2010. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate. Public Understanding of Science 1 DOI: 10.1177/0963662510371435.