Article first published online: 23 MAR 2012
©2012 Society for Conservation Biology
Volume 26, Issue 2, page 378, April 2012
How to Cite
(2012), Errata. Conservation Biology, 26: 378. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01852.x
- Issue published online: 23 MAR 2012
- Article first published online: 23 MAR 2012
Understanding Interaction Effects of Climate Change and Fire Management on Bird Distributions through Combined Process and Habitat ModelsComprensión de los Efectos de la Interacción del Cambio Climático y el Manejo de Fuego sobre la Distribución de Aves Mediante Modelos Combinados de Procesos y Hábitat
Vol. 25, Issue 3, 536–546, Article first published online: 28 APR 2011
In the June 2011 issue of Conservation Biology (volume 25, number 3) in “Chilean Blue Whales as a Case Study to Illustrate Methods to Estimate Abundance and Evaluate Conservation Status of Rare Species” by Williams et al. (pp. 536–546), Equations 2 and 3 should read as follows:
In the February 2012 issue of Conservation Biology (volume 26, number 1) in “Bolder Thinking for Conservation” by Noss et al. (pp. 1–4) affiliations for two authors were incorrect. Katarzyna Nowak's affiliation is Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A., and Roel Lopez's affiliation is Texas A & M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, College Station, TX 77843, U.S.A.
In the February 2010 issue of Conservation Biology (volume 24, number 1) in “Identifying Anomalous Reports of Putatively Extinct Species and Why it Matters” by Roberts et al. (pp. 189–196) the first sentence of the legend for Fig. 2 should read as follows: Estimated probability (p) that a species persists, given the sighting records shown in Table 2, for the (a) Eskimo Curlew, (b) Ivory-billed Woodpecker, (c) Nukupu'u, and (d) O'ahu ‘Alauahio.