Get access

Evaluating Maternity Care: A Core Set of Outcome Measures

Authors

  • Declan Devane RM, RNT, PgDip(Stats), MSc,

    Corresponding author
    1. 1Declan Devane is a Doctoral candidate and Lecturer in Midwifery, 2Cecily M. Begley is a Professor of Nursing and Midwifery/Director, and 3Colm OBoyle is a Lecturer in Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; 4Mike Clarke is a Director and Professor of Clinical Epidemiology, UK Cochrane Centre & University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and 5Dell Horey is the Australasian Consumer Panel Coordinator for the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Adelaide, Australia, and Liverpool, United Kingdom.
      Declan Devane, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24, D’Olier Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • 1 Cecily M. Begley RM, MSc, PhD, FTCD,

    1. 1Declan Devane is a Doctoral candidate and Lecturer in Midwifery, 2Cecily M. Begley is a Professor of Nursing and Midwifery/Director, and 3Colm OBoyle is a Lecturer in Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; 4Mike Clarke is a Director and Professor of Clinical Epidemiology, UK Cochrane Centre & University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and 5Dell Horey is the Australasian Consumer Panel Coordinator for the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Adelaide, Australia, and Liverpool, United Kingdom.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • 2 Mike Clarke BA(Oxon), DPhil,

    1. 1Declan Devane is a Doctoral candidate and Lecturer in Midwifery, 2Cecily M. Begley is a Professor of Nursing and Midwifery/Director, and 3Colm OBoyle is a Lecturer in Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; 4Mike Clarke is a Director and Professor of Clinical Epidemiology, UK Cochrane Centre & University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and 5Dell Horey is the Australasian Consumer Panel Coordinator for the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Adelaide, Australia, and Liverpool, United Kingdom.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • 4 Dell Horey PhD, MMedSc(ClinEpi), BAppSc(Chem),

    1. 1Declan Devane is a Doctoral candidate and Lecturer in Midwifery, 2Cecily M. Begley is a Professor of Nursing and Midwifery/Director, and 3Colm OBoyle is a Lecturer in Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; 4Mike Clarke is a Director and Professor of Clinical Epidemiology, UK Cochrane Centre & University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and 5Dell Horey is the Australasian Consumer Panel Coordinator for the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Adelaide, Australia, and Liverpool, United Kingdom.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • and 5 Colm OBoyle RM, RNT, PhDipCHSE, MSc 3

    1. 1Declan Devane is a Doctoral candidate and Lecturer in Midwifery, 2Cecily M. Begley is a Professor of Nursing and Midwifery/Director, and 3Colm OBoyle is a Lecturer in Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; 4Mike Clarke is a Director and Professor of Clinical Epidemiology, UK Cochrane Centre & University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and 5Dell Horey is the Australasian Consumer Panel Coordinator for the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Adelaide, Australia, and Liverpool, United Kingdom.
    Search for more papers by this author

Declan Devane, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24, D’Olier Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: Comparing the relative effectiveness of interventions on specific outcomes across trials can be problematic due to differences in the choice and definitions of outcome measures used by researchers. We sought to identify a minimum set of outcome measures for evaluating models of maternity care from the perspective of key stakeholders. Methods: A 3-round, electronic Delphi survey design was used. Setting was multinational, comprising a range of key stakeholders. Participants consisted of a single heterogeneous panel of maternity service users, midwives, obstetricians, pediatricians/neonatologists, family physicians/general practitioners, policy-makers, service practitioners, and researchers of maternity care. Members of the panel self-assessed their expertise in evaluating models of maternity care. Results: A total of 320 people from 28 countries expressed willingness to take part in this survey. Round 1 was completed by 218 (68.1%) participants, of whom 173 (79.4%) completed round 2 and 152 (87.9%) of these completed round 3. Fifty outcomes were identified, with both a mean value greater than the overall group mean for all outcomes combined (x = 4.18) and rated 4 or more on a 5-point Likert-type scale for importance of inclusion in a minimum data set of outcome measures by at least 70 percent of respondents. Three outcomes were collapsed into a single outcome so that the final minimum set includes 48 outcomes. Conclusions: Given the inconsistencies in the choice of outcome measures routinely collected and reported in randomized evaluations of maternity care, it is hoped that use of the data set will increase the potential for national and international comparisons of models for maternity care. Although not intended to be prescriptive or to inhibit the collection of other outcomes, we hope that the core set will make it easier to assess the care of women and their babies during pregnancy and childbirth. (BIRTH 34:2 June 2007)

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary