SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Dobson R. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales hits 21 percent. BMJ 2001;323:951.
  • 2
    Langer A, Villar J. Promoting evidence based practice in maternal care. BMJ 2002;324:928929.
  • 3
    Cotzias CS, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk N. Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: A survey of current opinion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;97:1516.
  • 4
    Paterson-Brown S. Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? Yes, as long as the woman is fully informed. BMJ 1998;317:462465.
  • 5
    Gamble J, Creedy D. Women’s request for a cesarean section: A critique of the literature. Birth 2000;27:256263.
  • 6
    Thomas J, Paranjothy S. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London, UK: RCOG Press, 2001.
  • 7
    Ecker J. Once a pregnancy, always a cesarean? Rationale and feasibility of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;90:314318.
  • 8
    Hannah M. Planned elective cesarean section: A reasonable choice for some women? CMAJ 2004;170:813814.
  • 9
    Hall M, Bewley S. Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. Lancet 1999;354:776.
  • 10
    Lilford RJ, Van Coeverden de Groot HA, Moore PJ, Bingham P. The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: A detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre-existing physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:883892.
  • 11
    Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V, Martin D, Easterling T. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA 2000;283:24112416.
  • 12
    Bewley S, Cockburn J. The unfacts of “request” caesarean section. BJOG 2002;109:597605.
  • 13
    Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res 1998;8:341351.
  • 14
    Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greathatch D, et al. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998;2(16):276.
  • 15
    Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Finding the findings in qualitative studies. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002;34:213219.
  • 16
    Lin H-C, Xirasagar S. Maternal age and the likelihood of a maternal request for cesarean delivery: A 5-year population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:848855.
  • 17
    Lee L, Holroyd E, Ng C. Exploring factors influencing Chinese women’s decision to have elective caesarean surgery. Midwifery 2001;17:314322.
  • 18
    Behague D, Victora C, Barros F. Consumer demand for Caesarean sections in Brazil: Informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ 2002;324942.
  • 19
    Potter J, Berquo E, Perpetuo I. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: Prospective study. BMJ 2001;323(7322):11551158.
  • 20
    Hopkins K. Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean? Soc Sci Med 2000;51:725740.
  • 21
    Murray S. Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: Qualitative and quantitative study. BMJ 2000;321:15011505.
  • 22
    Lo J. Patients’ attitudes vs. physicians’ determination: Implications for cesarean section. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:9196.
  • 23
    Lapeyre E, Finan M, Hedges S, et al. Patient choice for elective cesarean delivery: Report on a survey. Female Patient 2004;29:1214, 16, 19, 21–54.
  • 24
    Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Increasing cesarean section rates: Exploring the role of culture in an Australian community. Birth 2004;31:117124.
  • 25
    Gamble J, Creedy D. Women’s preference for a cesarean section: Incidence and associated factors. Birth 2001;28:101110.
  • 26
    Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenström U. Few women wish to be delivered by cesarean section. BJOG 2002;109:618623.
  • 27
    Edwards G, Davies N. Elective cesarean section—The patient’s choice? J Obstet Gynecol 2001;21:128129.
  • 28
    Chong E, Mongelli M. Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean section and vaginal deliveries. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2003;80:189194.
  • 29
    Donati S, Grandolfo M, Andreozzi S. Do Italian mothers prefer cesarean delivery? Birth 2003;30:8993.
  • 30
    Tatar M, Gunalp S, Somunoglu S, Aygul D. Women’s perceptions of cesarean section: Reflections from a Turkish teaching hospital. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:12271233.
  • 31
    Johanson R, El-Timini S, Rigby C, et al. Caesarean section by choice could fulfill the inverse care law. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;97:2022.
  • 32
    Marx H, Wiener J, Davies N. A survey of the influence of patients’ choice on the increase in the cesarean section rate. J Obstet Gynecol 2001;21:124127.
  • 33
    Van Teijlingen E, Hundley V, Rennie A, et al. Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: “What is, must still be best. Birth 2003;30:7582.
  • 34
    Waldenström U. Women’s memory of childbirth at two months and one year after the birth. Birth 2003;30:248254.
  • 35
    Simkin P. Just another day in a woman’s life? Nature and consistency of women’s long-term memories of their first birth experiences. Birth 1992;19(pt 2):6481.
  • 36
    Hannah M, Hannah W, Hewson S. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:13751383.