SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    The Cochrane Collaboration. Accessed September 10, 2008. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org.
  • 2
    The Society for Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Clinical Guidelines. Accessed September 10, 2008. Available at: http://www.sogc.org/guidelines/index_e.asp.
  • 3
    Health Canada. Family-Centred Maternity and Newborn Care: National Guidelines. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2000.
  • 4
    Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization. Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth: Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2000.
  • 5
    Thacker SB, Stroup D, Chang M. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labour. In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006; Issue 3. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000063.pub2.
  • 6
    Blix E, Reiner LM, Kloving A, Oian P. Prognostic value of the labour admission test and its effectiveness compared with auscultation only: A systematic review. BJOG 2005;112(12):15951604.
  • 7
    Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Healthy Beginnings: Guidelines for Care during Pregnancy and Childbirth. Number 71, Ottawa, Canada: Federal Publications Inc., 1998.
  • 8
    Chalmers B, Peat A, Porter R, et al. WHO Principles of Perinatal Care: The Essential Antenatal, Perinatal and Postpartum Care Course Manual. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1998.
  • 9
    Glantz JC. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labour associations and outcomes. J Reprod Med 2005;50(4):235240.
  • 10
    Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(4):CD004945.
  • 11
    Chalmers B, Mangiaterra V, Porter R. WHO principles of perinatal care: The essential antenatal, perinatal, and postpartum care course. Birth 2001;28(3):202207.
  • 12
    Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Howell C. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub2.
  • 13
    Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, et al. Outcomes of episiotomy: A systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:21412148.
  • 14
    Basevi V, Lavender T. Routine perineal shaving on admission in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(4):CD001236. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001236.
  • 15
    Cuervo LG, Del Pilar Bernal M, Mendoza N. Effects of high volume saline enemas vs. no enema during labour—The N-Ma randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN43153145]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2006;19:68.
  • 16
    Chalmers B, Porter R. Assessing effective care in normal labor: The Bologna Score. Birth 2001;28(2):7983.
  • 17
    Johanson RB, Menon V. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999: Issue 2. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000224.
  • 18
    McQuivey RW. Vacuum-assisted delivery: A review. J Mat-Fet Neonat Med 2004;16:171179.
  • 19
    Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Smyth R. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004; Issue 1 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub2.
  • 20
    Enkin M, Keirse M, Neilson J, et al. A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. 3rd ed. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 21
    Dzakpasu S, Kaczorowski J, Chalmers B, et al. The maternity experiences survey: Methodology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008;30:207216.
  • 22
    Beck LF, Johnson CH, Morrow B, et al. PRAMS 1999 Surveillance Report. Atlanta, Georgia: Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003.
  • 23
    Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, et al. Listening to Mothers: Report of the First National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. New York: Maternity Center Association, 2002.
  • 24
    Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV. Great Expectations: A Prospective Study of Women’s Expectations and Experiences of Childbirth. Second ed. Hale, U.K.: Books for Midwives Press, 1998.
  • 25
    Garcia J, Redshaw M, Fitzsimons B, Keene J. First Class Delivery: A National Survey of Women’s Views of Maternity Care. London, U.K.: Audit Commission, 1998.
  • 26
    Scottish Programme for Clinical Effectiveness in Reproductive Health. Maternity Care Matters: An Audit of Maternity Services in Scotland 1998. Aberdeen, Scotland: Douglas Baird Centre for Research on Women’s Health, 1999.
  • 27
    Brown S, Lumley J. Survey of Recent Mothers: Women’s Views and Experiences of Maternity Care. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for the Study of Mothers’ and Children’s Health, 1997.
  • 28
    Chalmers B, Muggah H, Samarskaya M, Tkatchenko E. Women’s experiences of birth in St Petersburg, Russian Federation, following a Maternal and Child Health Intervention program. Birth 1995;25:107116.
  • 29
    Public Health Agency of Canada. Maternity Experiences Survey, 2006. Questionnaire. Accessed September 29, 2008. Available at http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/rhs-ssg/pdf/question07_e.pdf.
  • 30
    Rao JNK, Wu CFJ. Resampling inference with complex survey data. J Am Stat Assoc 1988;83:231241.
  • 31
    SAS Institute Inc. SAS Software Release 8.2. Cary, North Carolina, 19992001.
  • 32
    Public Health Agency of Canada. What Women Say: The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Public Works and Government Services, In Press.
  • 33
    Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Fetal health surveillance in labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29(9 Suppl. 4.):S1S56.
  • 34
    Public Health Agency of Canada. Perinatal Health Report. Public Health Agency of Canada Report: 2008 Edition. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2008.