SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Nicholson JM, Kellar LC, Cronholm PF, Macones GA. Active management of risk in pregnancy at term in an urban population: An association between a higher induction of labor rate and a lower cesarean delivery rate [see comment]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(5):15161528.
  • 2
    Nicholson JM, Yeager DL, Macones G. A preventive approach to obstetric care in a rural hospital: Association between higher rates of preventive labor induction and lower rates of cesarean delivery. Ann Fam Med 2007;5(4):310319.
  • 3
    Nicholson JM, Parry S, Caughey AB, et al. The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198(5):511.e1511.e15.
  • 4
    Klein MC. Association not causation: What is the intervention? Ann Fam Med 2007;5(4):294297.
  • 5
    Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Brant R. “Preventive induction” fails to demonstrate benefits for mothers or newborn infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol (In press).
  • 6
    Klein MC, Grzybowski S, Harris S, et al. Epidural analgesia use as a marker for physician approach to birth: Implications for maternal and newborn outcomes. Birth 2001;28(4):243248.
  • 7
    Yancey MK, Zhang J, Schweitzer DL, et al. Epidural analgesia and fetal head malposition at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(4):608612.