SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Joyce L. Marshall, Helen Spiby, Felicia McCormick, Evaluating the ‘Focus on Normal Birth and Reducing Caesarean section Rates Rapid Improvement Programme’: A mixed method study in England, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 2, 332

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Amie Steel, Jon Adams, Jane Frawley, Alex Broom, David Sibbritt, The characteristics of women who birth at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital labour ward: A study of a nationally-representative sample of 1835 pregnant women, Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2015,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Ramón Escuriet, María Pueyo, Herminia Biescas, Cristina Colls, Isabel Espiga, Joanna White, Xavi Espada, Josep Fusté, Vicente Ortún, Obstetric interventions in two groups of hospitals in Catalonia: a cross-sectional study, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2014, 14, 1, 143

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Amie Steel, Jon Adams, David Sibbritt, Alex Broom, Jane Frawley, Cindy Gallois, Relationship between complementary and alternative medicine use and incidence of adverse birth outcomes: An examination of a nationally representative sample of 1835 Australian women, Midwifery, 2014, 30, 12, 1157

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Ingegerd Hildingsson, Kajsa Westlund, Ingela Wiklund, Burnout in Swedish midwives, Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2013, 4, 3, 87

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Tonje Lippert, Ellen Nesje, Karen Sofie Koss, Pål Øian, Change in risk status during labor in a large Norwegian obstetric department: a prospective study, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2013, 92, 6
  7. 7
    Trudy Klomp, Ank de Jonge, Eileen K Hutton, Antoine LM Lagro-Janssen, Dutch women in midwife-led care at the onset of labour: which pain relief do they prefer and what do they use?, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2013, 13, 1, 230

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Beverley A. Lawton, Abby Koch, James Stanley, Stacie E. Geller, The effect of midwifery care on rates of cesarean delivery, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2013, 123, 3, 213

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Stine Bernitz, Eline Aas, Pål Øian, Economic evaluation of birth care in low-risk women. A comparison between a midwife-led birth unit and a standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in Norway. A randomised controlled trial, Midwifery, 2012, 28, 5, 591

    CrossRef

  10. You have free access to this content10
    HL McLachlan, DA Forster, MA Davey, T Farrell, L Gold, MA Biro, L Albers, M Flood, J Oats, U Waldenström, Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2012, 119, 12
  11. 11
    BRITT-INGJERD NESHEIM, Low-risk labor – outcomes after introduction of special guidelines combined with increased awareness of risk category, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2012, 91, 4
  12. 12
    Bénédicte Coulm, Camille Ray, Nathalie Lelong, Nicolas Drewniak, Jennifer Zeitlin, Béatrice Blondel, Obstetric Interventions for Low-Risk Pregnant Women in France: Do Maternity Unit Characteristics Make a Difference?, Birth, 2012, 39, 3
  13. 13
    Meredith J. McIntyre, Safety of non-medically led primary maternity care models: a critical review of the international literature, Australian Health Review, 2012, 36, 2, 140

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Charlotta Tingstig, Karin Gottvall, Charlotta Grunewald, Ulla Waldenström, Satisfaction with a Modified Form of In-Hospital Birth Center Care Compared with Standard Maternity Care, Birth, 2012, 39, 2