Article first published online: 28 FEB 2012
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Volume 39, Issue 1, page 89, March 2012
How to Cite
(2012), Erratum. Birth, 39: 89. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00526.x
- Issue published online: 28 FEB 2012
- Article first published online: 28 FEB 2012
Vol. 38, Issue 4, 282–293, Article first published online: 6 SEP 2011
We apologize for two errors in the article “Fetal Movement Counting—Effects on Maternal-Fetal Attachment: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial,” Birth 2011:38(4):282–293.
The results, interpretation, and conclusions are correct, but two numbers have been incorrectly reported. The correct numbers are as follows:
- •In the Abstract: The means and standard deviations of the total scores on antenatal attachment were 59.54 (9.39) and 59.34 (9.75) for the control and the intervention group, respectively. These analyses are correctly presented in the Results section.
- •In the Abstract and the Results section: A minus sign is missing in the 95% CI for the mean difference between the groups; it should read as follows: “(95% CI: −1.02–1.42).”