Ethel Burns, Mary Boulton, and Lesley Smith were funded by Oxford Brookes University, Oxford; Elizabeth Cluett was funded by The University of Southampton, Southampton; and Victoria Cornelius was funded by King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Characteristics, Interventions, and Outcomes of Women Who Used a Birthing Pool: A Prospective Observational Study
Article first published online: 3 JUL 2012
© 2012, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Volume 39, Issue 3, pages 192–202, September 2012
How to Cite
Burns, E. E., Boulton, M. G., Cluett, E., Cornelius, V. R. and Smith, L. A. (2012), Characteristics, Interventions, and Outcomes of Women Who Used a Birthing Pool: A Prospective Observational Study. Birth, 39: 192–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00548.x
- Issue published online: 29 AUG 2012
- Article first published online: 3 JUL 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 JAN 2012
This article has been cited by:
- 1Importance of the Birth Environment to Support Physiologic Birth, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 2016,, , ,
- You have free access to this content2
- 3Immersion in water for pain relief and the risk of intrapartum transfer among low risk nulliparous women: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2014, 14, 1, 60, , , , ,
- 7How valid are the common concerns raised against water birth? A focused review of the literature, Women and Birth, 2013, 26, 2, 105, ,
- You have free access to this content8